IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 5TH SRAVANA, 1944
RSA NO. 408 OF 2015
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN AS 12/2008 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR
AND OS 155/2003 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, TIRUR
APPELLANTS:
1 RAIHANATH
AGED 29 YEARS,D/O.YOUSEF, NADUTHODI HOUSE, TIRURANGADI
TALUK, PUTHOOR AMSOM DESOM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2 SAINABA
AGED 27 YEARS
D/O.YOUSEF, DO. DO.
3 YOUSEF
AGED 62 YEARS
S/O.KUNHAVARAN, DO.DO.
BY ADV SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 RUBEENA
AGED 23 YEARS
D/O.MALAYIL KADEEJA, DO.DO.
2 THASLEENA
AGED 22 YEARS
D/O.MALAYIL KADEEJA, DO. DO.
3 SHIHAB
AGED 20 YEARS
S/O.MALAYIL KADEEJA, DO. DO.
4 MALAYIL KADEEJA
AGED 50 YEARS
S/O.SAID, MALAYIL HOUSE, KOTTAKKAL AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR
TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
27.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.S.A No.408 of 2015 2
M.R.ANITHA, J.
===========================
R.S.A No.408 of 2015
============================
Dated this the 27th day of July, 2022
JUDGMENT
The above Regular Second Appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and decree in A.S.No.12 of 2008 of the Sub Court, Tirur and also the judgment and decree in O.S.No.155 of 2003 of the Munsiff's Court, Tirur.
2. Today, when the case was taken for hearing, it is reported by the learned counsel for the appellants that a memo has been filed to the effect that the 1st and 2nd appellants along with their step brother and sister together had purchased the entire right, title and interest of 3rd appellant their father and all the respondents over the plaint schedule property as per document No.2254/2022 of the Kottakkal Sub Registrar Office.
3. The learned counsel for the respondents also present. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the appellant filed memo to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn. Accordingly, the memo recorded and appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
M. R. ANITHA JUDGE nk