Laila vs Haritha V Kumar

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9037 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2022

Kerala High Court
Laila vs Haritha V Kumar on 27 July, 2022
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

         WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 5TH SRAVANA, 1944

                           RP NO. 753 OF 2021

   AGAINST THE JUDGMENT WP(C) 35344/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

REVIEW PETITIONER/S:

     1       THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA),
             OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), THRISSUR-680 022.

     2       DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
             FIRST FLOOR, CIVIL STATION, KALYAN NAGAR, AYANTHOLE,
             THRISSUR-680 003.

     3       STATE OF KERALA,
             REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, P.W.D.
             GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

             BY ADV SPL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUDHA DEVI



RESPONDENT/S:

     1       LAILA,
             W/O.ABDULLAKUTTY, PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE P.O.,
             MALAPPURAM-679 558, REPRESENTED BY THE P.A. HOLDER
             P.V.ABDULLAKUTTY, S/O.VEERAN, PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE
             P.O.

     2       SHAIBEER,
             S/O.ABDULLAKUTTY, PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE P.O.,
             MALAPPURAM-679 558, REPRESENTED BY THE P.A. HOLDER
             P.V.ABDULLAKUTTY, S/O.VEERAN, PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE
             P.O.

     3       SHAMEEM,
             S/O.ABDULLAKUTTY, PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE P.O.,
             MALAPPURAM-679 558, REPRESENTED BY THE P.A. HOLDER
             P.V.ABDULLAKUTTY, S/O.VEERAN, PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE
             P.O.


     THIS     REVIEW   PETITION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON

27.07.2022, ALONG WITH COC 1138/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

         WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 5TH SRAVANA, 1944

                      CON.CASE(C) NO. 1138 OF 2021

   AGAINST THE JUDGMENT WP(C) 35344/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

PETITIONER/S:

     1       LAILA
             AGED 62 YEARS
             W/O. ABDULLAKUTTY, PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE P.O.,
             MALAPPURAM-679558 REPRESENTED BY THE P.A.HOLDER
             P.V.ABDULLAKUTTY, S/O. VEERAN, AGED 73 YEARS,
             PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE P.O.

     2       SHAIBEER
             S/O. ABDULLAKUTTY, AGED 39, PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE
             P.O., MALAPPURAM-679558 REPRESENTED BY THE P.A.HOLDER
             P.V.ABDULLAKUTTY, S/O. VEERAN, AGED 73 YEARS,
             PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE P.O.

     3       SHAMEEM
             S/O. ABDULLAKUTTY, AGED 37, PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE
             P.O., MALAPPURAM-679558 REPRESENTED BY THE P.A.HOLDER
             P.V.ABDULLAKUTTY, S/O. VEERAN, AGED 73 YEARS,
             PAZHOORVALAPPIL, ALANKODE P.O.

             BY ADV G.KRISHNAKUMAR



RESPONDENT/S:

     1       HARITHA V KUMAR
             DISTRICT COLLECTOR, W/O. HUSBAND'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
             PETITIONER, AGED 37, CIVIL STATION, KALYAN NAGAR,
             AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680 003.

     2       ADDL. MADHU.K
             FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEPUTY
             COLLECTOR (RR SECTION) KSFE BLDG., CHEMBUKAVU PO 680206

             IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IA 1/2022 DT.

             BY ADV SPL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUDHA DEVI



     THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD

ON 27.07.2022, ALONG WITH RP 753/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                     A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

    ------------------------------------------
     R.P.No.753/2021 IN W.P.(C).No.35344/2018
                        &
           CON.CASE(C) NO. 1138 OF 2021
    ------------------------------------------

                                O R D E R

Dated this the 27th day of July, 2022 R.P.No.753/2021 IN W.P.(C).No.35344/2018:

In the light of the enquiry report placed before this Court, there is no factual error in appreciating the circumstances in which the petitioners in the original petition were forced to accept the compensation amount awarded. Further, there is an error in the operative portion of the judgment as this Court had set aside the entire proceedings leading to the acquisition which apparently convey that the entire proceedings relating to the acquisition pursuant to the notification have been set R.P.No.753/2021 IN W.P.(C).No.35344/2018 & CON.CASE(C) NO. 1138 OF 2021 -:2:- aside. In fact, this Court had only intended to confine setting aside of the proceedings to the extent applicable to the writ petitioners alone. Accordingly, the judgment is clarified and reviewed. Fresh award shall be passed in accordance with law within a period of three months from today. It is made clear that no further time will be granted to pass the award.

CON.CASE(C) NO. 1138 OF 2021:

In the light of the above order in R.P.No.753/2021 in W.P.(C).No.35344/2018 extending time by three months from today, as a last chance, to pass a fresh award, the contempt case is closed with liberty to move again if so required.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms APPENDIX OF R.P.No.753/2021 IN W.P.(C).No.35344/2018 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE DLPC MEETING AND THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE BASIC VALUE OF THE LAND.

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1138/2021 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure P1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMETN DATED 12.4.2019 IN WPC NO.35344/2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

Annexure P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT DATED 16.5.2019 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE RESPONDENT.