IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2022 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 4 OF 2016
PETITIONER:
AUGUSTY
AGED 61 YEARS
S/O. MANIVELIL JOSEPH,
EDAMARUKU KARA,
UDUMPANNUR VILLAGE,
CHEENIKUZHI P.O.,
THODUPUZHA TALUK - 685 595.
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.,
LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2 THE KARIMANNUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,
P.O.KARIMANNOOR,
IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 581.
R1 BY SRI. K.P. HARISH, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
R2 BY ADVS.SRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY
SRI.MATHEW JOHN K
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 01.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C.) No. 4/2016
2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-
"i). call for the records leading to Ext.P7 and may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari quashing the same.
ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the second respondent to immediately number the building of the petitioner constructed in terms of Ext.P1, in the interest of justice."
2. The case of the petitioner is that petitioner has carried out construction of a building after securing Ext.P1 permit from the Secretary of the Karimannoor Grama Panchayat - the second respondent herein. It is the further case of the petitioner that the construction was carried out in accordance with the permit and plan approved by the Secretary. However, building is not assigned with a number. But at the same time, the Secretary of the Grama Panchayat has issued various communications to the petitioner stating that the W.P.(C.) No. 4/2016 3 construction carried out by the petitioner is violative of Section 220(b) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.
3. From the perusal of the documents produced by the petitioner, it is quite clear and evident that the petitioner has not submitted any reply to the Secretary of the Grama Panchayat in spite of the Secretary issuing a notice and pointing out that the construction is violative of Section 220(b) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Whatever that be, when a building construction is completed after securing a building permit, the building owner has to necessarily submit a completion certificate as prescribed under the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2011 and seek occupancy. At that point of time, the Secretary has to necessarily conduct due inspection and find out as to whether the building is constructed in W.P.(C.) No. 4/2016 4 accordance with the building permit and as per the provisions of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2011. The petitioner has no case in this writ petition that after the construction of the building, the petitioner has approached the Secretary of the Grama Panchayat with a completion certificate in order to secure occupancy certificate and building number. Even though petitioner has produced Ext.P2 demand raised, as if to appear that the Panchayat has raised the demand, in fact Ext.P2 is a demand notice raised by the Thahsildar as per Section 3 of the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975, which has nothing to do with the illegality in construction.
4. In that view of the matter, I do not think that the petitioner is entitled to get any relief as sought for by the petitioner. Therefore, the reliefs sought for in the writ petition are declined. W.P.(C.) No. 4/2016 5 However, petitioner is granted with a liberty to approach the Secretary with an application for issuing occupancy certificate along with all the other attendant documents. If any such application is submitted within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the said application shall be finalised by the Secretary, in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of participation to the petitioner herein within two months thereafter.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE DCS/01.07.2022 W.P.(C.) No. 4/2016 6 APPENDIX PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT GRANTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 30.5.2012. Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE TALUK OFFICE THODUPPZHA DT. 26.2.2014.
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE KARIMANNOOR VILLAGE OFFICE DT.
18.3.2014.
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH PREPARED BY THE LAND SURVEYOR DT. 07.4.2014. Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT BEARING NO.
1676/2014 DT. 27.5.2014 OF THE KARIKODE S.R.O.
Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 04.3.2014.
Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED NIL