Sebastian V. Mathew vs Edathua Grama Panchayath

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9807 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2022

Kerala High Court
Sebastian V. Mathew vs Edathua Grama Panchayath on 26 August, 2022
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

         FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 4TH BHADRA, 1944

                         WP(C) NO. 21610 OF 2017

PETITIONER/S:

           SEBASTIAN V. MATHEW
           AGED 53 YEARS
           S/O.C.M.MATHEW, AGED 53 YEARS, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE,
           CHECKIDIKAVU PO, EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
           BY ADV SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS


RESPONDENT/S:

     1     EDATHUA GRAMA PANCHAYATH
           REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, EDATHUA PO, ALAPPUZHA
           DISTRICT-689 573.
     2     JOSE MATHEW
           S/O.V.S.MATHEW (LATE), VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PACHE MURI,
           CHEKKIDIKKAD PO, EDATHUA VILLAGE, KUTTANADU TALUK,
           ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-689 573.
           BY ADV SHRI.M.V.S.NAMPOOTHIRY



      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26.08.2022,

     THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No. 21610/2016               :2:



                            SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
          ---------------------------------------------------------
                       W.P.(C). No. 21610 of 2016
            ---------------------------------------------------------
                Dated this the 26th day of August, 2022.

                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to execute Ext. P3 decision and also a direction to the first respondent to repair the Panchayat road leading from Kochuparambil Padi to Ezhil Padi in Ward No.12 of Edathua Grama Panchayat forthwith and collect the expenses incurred from the first respondent.

2. However, today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

sd/­ SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.

Rv