Raji vs State Of Kerala

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9321 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2022

Kerala High Court
Raji vs State Of Kerala on 10 August, 2022
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022/19TH SRAVANA, 1944
                 BAIL APPL. NO. 5847 OF 2022
CRIME NO.5847/2022 OF KARUNAGAPALLY EXCISE RANGE OFFICE,
                            KOLLAM
PETITIONER:

            RAJI
            AGED 41 YEARS, W/O. SATHEESAN, PUTHENTHOPPU
            PUTHUVAL, MARY LAND, NEENDAKARA VILLAGE,
            KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT,
            PIN 691582

            BY ADV E.C.AHAMED FAZIL


RESPONDENTS:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
    2       THE EXCISE RANGE INSPECTOR
            KARUNAGAPALLY EXCISE RANGE OFFICE,
            KOLLAM , PIN - 690544

            BY ADV
            SMT.SEETHA.S - SR.PP


        THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 10.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 BA. No.5847/2022

                                     ..2..



                            ORDER

Dated this the 10th day of August, 2022 This is an application for Anticipatory Bail.

2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.141/2022 of Karunagapally Excise Range Office, Kollam alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 55(i) of the Kerala Abkari Act.

3. The prosecution case is that, on 01.07.2022 at about 8.00 am, the petitioner herein was allegedly found in possession of 3.8 liters of Indian Made Foreign Liquor from the premises of petitioner and thereby committed the above said offence.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is falsely implicated in the above said crime and further submitted that the petitioner's son met with an accident and he is undergoing treatment as is evident from Anx.A1 and A2 - Medical records.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, upon instruction, submitted that the contraband was seized from the house of BA. No.5847/2022 ..3..

the petitioner and that she has no other criminal antecedents also.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to stringent conditions. In the result, this application is allowed. In the event of arrest of the petitioner in Crime No.141/2022 of Karunagapally Excise Range Office, Kollam, the petitioner shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate and shall be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Petitioner shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like- sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court ;
(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.141/2022 of Karunagapally Excise Range Office, Kollam as and when summoned to do so;

(iii) Petitioner shall not attempt to interfere BA. No.5847/2022 ..4..

with the investigation or to influence or intimidate any witness in Crime No.141/2022 of Karunagapally Excise Range Office, Kollam;

(iv) Petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in Crime No.141/2022 of Karunagapally Excise Range Office, Kollam may file an application before the jurisdictional Court, for cancellation of bail.

It is made clear that it is within the power of the police to investigate the matter and if necessary to effect recoveries on the information if any given by the petitioner, even when the petitioner is on bail as per the judgment of the Apex Court in Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State(NCT of Delhi) and another(2020(1)KHC 663).

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM, JUDGE ded/10.08.2022