Kerala High Court
Mall Of Joy Pvt Ltd vs Leo Louis on 10 August, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 19TH SRAVANA, 1944
OP(C) NO. 421 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02.02.2022 I.A.NO.2/2021 IN CMA
1/2022 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT/COMMERCIAL COURT, THRISSUR
PETITIONER:
MALL OF JOY PVT LTD
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
DOOR NO: XVII/387, MALL OF JOY,
BAKER JUNCTION,
KOTTAYAM- 686001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, TENSON T.T.
BY ADVS. P.MARTIN JOSE
AJAY BEN JOSE
MANJUNATH MENON
SACHIN JACOB AMBAT
ANNA LINDA V.J
HANI P.NAIR
R.GITHESH
HARIKRISHNAN S.
S.SREEKUMAR (SR.)
P.PRIJITH
THOMAS P.KURUVILLA
RESPONDENTS:
1 LEO LOUIS,
AGED 48 YEARS,
S/O. E.O. LOUIS, HOUSE NO. 1/21,
THRISSUR CORPORATION,
EDAVATHUNGAL HOUSE,
KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA DESOM,
CHEMBUKKAVU, THRISSUR,
PIN - 680020
2 JOE LOUIS,
AGED 43 YEARS,
S/O. E.O. LOUIS, HOUSE NO. 1/21,
THRISSUR CORPORATION,
EDAVATHUNGAL HOUSE,
KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA DESOM,
CHEMBUKKAVU, THRISSUR, PIN - 680020
O.P.(C)No.421/2022
-:2:-
3 SALEENA @ CELINE LOUIS,
W/O. E.O. LOUIS,
HOUSE NO. 1/21, THRISSUR CORPORATION,
EDAVATHUNGAL HOUSE,
KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA DESOM,
CHEMBUKKAVU, THRISSUR, PIN - 680020
4 PINTO PETER,
S/O. E.O. PETER, HOUSE NO. 825/4,
THRISSUR CORPORATION,
ELAVUTHUNGAL HOUSE, MANALIPADAM STREET,
KURIACHIRA DESOM OLLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR ,
PIN - 680006
5 M/S. PRECIOUS INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.
10/815/16 ST. LOUIS COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, CHURCH
CIRCLE, ERINJERI ANGADI, THRISSUR,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR JOE LOUIS
PIN - 680001
6 ALUKKAS VARGHESE JOY,
DIRECTOR, M/S. MALL OF JOY PVT. LTD.,
ALUKKAS HOUSE, DOOR NO. 368,
KURIYICHIRA P.O., THRISSUR,
PIN - 680006
BY ADVS. ADV.GANESH BALAKRISHNAN (B/O)
GANGESH K B
P.K.SURESH KUMAR (SR.)(S-793)
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
O.P.(C)No.421/2022
-:3:-
Dated this the 10th day of August,2022
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the original petition, without prejudice to their rights to raise all the contentions before the learned Arbitrator.
2. The said submission is recorded. This original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/10.08.22 //True copy/ P.A.To Judge