Sreeshankar Sivasankaran Nair vs Meera Govind

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4895 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2022

Kerala High Court
Sreeshankar Sivasankaran Nair vs Meera Govind on 29 April, 2022
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
                              &
         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
  FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 9TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                   OP (FC) NO. 234 OF 2022
       IN OP(GW) 2121/2020 OF FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER:

         SREESHANKAR SIVASANKARAN NAIR,
         AGED 48 YEARS,
         KAILAS, AYYARATTY VEEDU,
         CHAMPAZHANTHY P.O,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 587
         NOW RESIDING AT FLAT SFG, LEKHA APARTMENT,
         OPPOSITE TO POORNATHRAYEESA TEMPLE,
         THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM,
         PIN - 682301.

         BY ADVS. SRI.P.SANJAY
                   SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON
                   SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR
                   SRI.PAUL VARGHESE (PALLATH)
                   SRI.P.A.MOHAMMED ASLAM
                   SRI.KIRAN NARAYANAN
                   SRI.PRASOON SUNNY
                   SRI.RAHUL RAJ P.


RESPONDENT:

         MEERA GOVIND,
         AGED 42 YEARS,
         GAYATHRI, OPPOSIE TO PUTHEN BUNGLOW TEMPLE,
         KOTTAKKAKAM,
         THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM.,
         PIN - 682301

     THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(FC).No.234/2022

                                        -:2:-




                       Dated this the 29th day of April,2022

                              JUDGMENT

C.S.DIAS,J.

The Original Petition is filed to direct the Family Court, Ernakulam, to consider and dispose of I.A.No.1803/2022(Ext.P7) within a time frame.

2. The case of the petitioner is that, despite interim orders being passed, the respondent is not providing the custody of his children named 'Sreelakshmi Sreeshankar' and 'Ishwarsubramania Sreeshankar'. Therefore, the petitioner was constrained to move this Court. This Court had passed Ext.P4 judgment, holding that the petitioner would be entitled to have custody of his children from 10 a.m. till 5 p.m. on first and third Saturdays of every month. This Court also observed that the Family Court would be at liberty to modify Ext.P4 judgment for any valid or O.P.(FC).No.234/2022 -:3:- sufficient reasons. The Family Court was also directed to dispose of the Original Petition in a time frame. Now, the petitioner has filed Ext.P7 application, to modify the judgment, as observed by this Court in Ext.P4. However, the application is pending consideration. Hence, the Original Petition.

3. Heard; Smt. A. Parvathi Menon, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Latha Vinod, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that she is confining the prayer to the consideration of Ext.P7 alone.

5. In the above factual matrix, we direct the Family Court, Ernakulam, to consider and dispose of Ext.P7, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible at any rate on or before 30.07.2022. During the interregnum, we direct the respondent to handover O.P.(FC).No.234/2022 -:4:- the custody of the children to the petitioner on every first and third Saturdays from 10 a.m. till 5 p.m. The petitioner shall ensure that his sister or his mother shall be with him, while the children are in his interim custody. The venue for the exchange of the children shall be before the CMO of the Family Court, Ernakulam.

The Original Petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS,JUDGE Sd/-

                             C. JAYACHANDRAN,JUDGE


DST/29.04.22                                        //True copy/

                                                    P.A.To Judge
 O.P.(FC).No.234/2022

                                -:5:-




                             APPENDIX



PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1         TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.6.20

IN O.P NO. 2640/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 7.11.2019 BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF G.O.P.NO. 2121 OF 2020 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 4-11-2020 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP (FC) 335/21 DATED DATED 2-8-2021.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. NO. 1/21 AND 2 OF 2021 IN OP (FC) 335/2021 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A.NO. 1 OF 2021 IN O.P.(FC).NO. 335 OF 2021 DATED 6-9-2021 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A.NO. 1803/22 IN O.P.NO. 2121 OF 2020 OF THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 10-3-2022. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. 2205/22 IN O.P.NO. 2121 OF 2020 OF THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 13-4-2022. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL