IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 9TH VAISAKHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 14948 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
BIJU.E.C., AGED 44 YEARS
SON OF CHACKO, CLERK,
ASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL,S.BATHERY P O,
WAYANAD DISTRICT-673592(RESIDING AT
ETTAMPARAMBIL.P.O, PUTHENKUNNU, WAYANAD
DISTRICT-673595),(M.9496344922).
BY ADVS.
V.A.MUHAMMED
V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEXE
II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,
JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014.
3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
CIVIL STATION, KALPETTA NORTH, WAYANAD DISTRICT-
673121.
4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
WAYANAD @ KALPETTA-673122.
5 THE CORPORATE MANAGER,
CORPORATE MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOLS, DIOCESE OF
MANANTHAVADY, DWARAKA, MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD
WP(C) No.14948/2022
..2..
DISTRICT-670645.
6 THE HEADMASTER,
ASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL, S.BATHERY.P.O,
WAYANAD DISTRICT-673592.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT PARVATHY .K GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 29.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.14948/2022
..3..
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose Ext.P9, an appeal petition claiming, inter alia, to grant higher grades reckoning his service rendered as Last Grade Employee, after affording him an opportunity of hearing, within a time frame.
2. After hearing the learned counsel on either side and taking into account the pendency of the appeal petition, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law on Ext.P9 appeal petition within a period of four months from today after hearing the petitioner and other affected parties, if any, either through physical or online mode. The petitioner will be free to produce any WP(C) No.14948/2022 ..4..
material, which he relies on, for substantiating his contentions. Needless to say that the 1st respondent will advert to such contentions, while considering the appeal. This Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
JUDGE bka/30.04.2022 WP(C) No.14948/2022 ..5..
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14948/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PAGE 15 OF THE SERVICE BOOK OF THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE SERVICE BOOK OF THE PETITIONER Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 01.10.2001 AND APPROVAL RECORDED THEREON THE DEO, CHANGANACHERRY Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 11.12.2006 AND APPROVAL RECORDED THEREON BY THE DEO, CHANGANACHERRY.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 02.05.2007 AND APPROVAL RECORDED THEREON BY THE DEO, CHANGANACHERRY Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF G.O.(P) NO.85/2011/FIN.DATED 26.02.2011 OF THE GOVERNMENT (ANNEXURE III) Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF FIXATION OF PAY OF THE PETITIONER DATED 08.06.2015 Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT)NO.5815/2021/GEDN DATED 10.12.2021 OF THE GOVERNMENT Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 30.03.2022 Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION REPORTED IN 2012(2) KHC 750 DECIDED ON 04.04.2012.