Thoompan vs Nangeeli

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                        PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
 FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 9TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                 R.S.A.NO.1253 OF 2014
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 03.07.2014 IN A.S.
NO.3 OF 2008 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT COURT, MANJERI WHICH
ARISES FROM THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 31.10.2007 IN
    O.S.NO.287 OF 2004 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, MANJERI
APPELLANTS:
    1    THOOMPAN,
         S/O.VADERY CHOOLANKUTTY, KARIPPUR AMSOM,
         CHIRAYIL DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, PIN - 673 647.

   2     VADERI SHAJI, AGED 38 YEARS,
         S/O.THOOMPAN, KARIPPUR AMSOM, KUNNATHUMPARAMBA,
         PIN - 673 647.

   3     REENA, AGED 31 YEARS,
         W/O.VADERI SHAJI, KARIPPUR AMSOM DESOM,
         KUNNATHUMPARAMBA, PIN - 673 647.

         BY ADVS.
         SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
         SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS
         SRI.P.GOPINATH
         SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI
         SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN
         SRI.KURYAN THOMAS


RESPONDENTS:
    1    NANGEELI, AGED 63 YEARS,
         D/O.VADERI CHOOLANKUTTY, KARIPUR AMSOM,
         CHIRAYIL DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, PIN - 673 647.

    2    CHAKKIKUTTY, AGED 67 YEARS,
         D/O.VADERI CHOOLANKUTTY, W/O.VELUTHON
         KUNHATHAN, PALLIKKAL AMSOM, PUTHUR DESOM, PIN -
         673 636.
 R.S.A.NO.1253 OF 2014

                               2




     3      KAMALAKSHI,
            AGED 61 YEARS,
            D/O.VADERI CHOOLANKUTTY, W/O.KAKKODAN VALIYA
            NEELANDAN, KARIPPUR AMSOM, DESOM, PIN - 673 647.

     4      KUMMINI,
            AGED 59 YEARS,
            D/O.VADERI CHOOLANKUTTY, W/O.ELUMBAN KAKKODAN,
            PUKAYOOR, KODUVAYOOR AMSOM, DESOM, THIRURANGADI
            TALUK, PIN - 676 306.

     5      KUTTUR AVUNHIKKADAN KUNHIKKANNAN'S CHILDREN
            SANTHOSH, AGED 30 YEARS,
            PALLIKKAL AMSOM DESOM, KUTTOOR NORTH,
            PIN - 676 305.

     6      SATHEESH (MINOR), AGED 23

     7      SAJINI (MINOR), AGED 21

     8      KUTTUR AVUNHIKKADAN KUNHIKKANNAN,
            AGED 55 YEARS,
            PALLIKKAL AMSOM AND DESOM, KUTTOOR NORTH,
            (RESPONDENTS 6 & 7 REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN FATHER
            8TH RESPONDENT), PIN - 676 305.

     9      KUNNAMPALLIL VELAYUDHAN,
            AGED 55 YEARS,
            S/O.KUNHAN, KARIPPUR AMSOM DESOM,
            KUNNATHUPARAMBA, PIN - 673 647.

    10      MANGATTAYIL DASAN, AGED 50 YEARS,
            S/O.KUNHELU, CHENBUVIL (H), PARAMBIL PEEDIKA,
            PIN - 676 317.

    11      LEELA, AGED 63 YEARS,
            W/O.KARIKUTTY PATHRAYI (LATE), KUNNATHUPARAMBA,
            KARIPUR AMSOM DESOM, PIN - 673 647.
 R.S.A.NO.1253 OF 2014

                                 3




    12       SULOCHANA, AGED 44 YEARS,
             D/O.LATE KARIKUTTY PATHRAYI, KUNNATHUPARAMBA,
             KARIPUR AMSOM DESOM, PIN - 673 647.

    13       SURESH, AGED 38 YEARS,
             S/O.KARIKUTTY PATHRAYI(LATE), KUNNATHUPARAMBA,
             KARIPUR AMSOM DESOM, PIN - 673 647.

    14       RAVI, AGED 35 YEARS,
             S/O.KARIKUTTY PATHRAYI(LATE), KUNNATHUPARAMBA,
             KARIPUR AMSOM DESOM, PIN - 673 647.

    15       SUMATHI, AGED 33 YEARS,
             D/O.KARIKUTTY PATHRAYI(LATE), KUNNATHUPARAMBA,
             KARIPUR AMSOM DESOM, PIN - 673 647.

    16       GIREESH, AGED 30 YEARS,
             S/O.KARIKUTTY PATHRAYI(LATE), KUNNATHUPARAMBA,
             KARIPUR AMSOM DESOM, PIN - 673 647.

    17       SUJATHA, AGED 28 YEARS,
             D/O.KARIKUTTY PATHRAYI(LATE), KUNNATHUPARAMBA,
             KARIPUR AMSOM DESOM, PIN - 673 647.

             BY ADVS.
             SRI.K.M.FIROZ
             SRI.S.KANNAN
             SMT.M.SHAJNA


      THIS    REGULAR   SECOND   APPEAL   HAVING    COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION     ON   29.04.2022,   THE   COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 R.S.A.NO.1253 OF 2014

                                4


                        JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 29th April, 2022) The learned counsel for the appellants submits that this appeal is not pressed. A memo to that effect has also been filed.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE MIN