IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
FRIDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 18TH POUSHA, 1942
RP.No.866 OF 2014(C) IN RSA. 1076/2012
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN RSA 1076/2012 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER:
PAUL THOMAS
AGED 67 YEARS
S/O. K.P. THOMAS, EX-WORKER, P.F. NO. 3170,
RESIDING AT ESTATE LINE, P.P. NO. VII/28 1993-98
FACTORY DIVISION, PALLIVASAL ESTATE, IDUKKI.
DIST.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU PAUL
RESPONDENT:
TATA TEA LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BISHOP LEFROY
ROAD, CALCUTTA, AND REGIONAL OFFICE AT MUNNAR,
KDH VILLAGE, REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER SREE KUMAR, ASST. MANAGEER, KDHP
COMPANY LTD., MUNNAR-685612.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS
R1 BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS
R1 BY ADV. SRI.BINU MATHEW
R1 BY ADV. SRI.ISAAC THOMAS
R1 BY ADV. SRI.NOBY THOMAS CYRIAC
R1 BY ADV. SRI.TOM THOMAS KAKKUZHIYIL
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
08.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RP.No.866 of 2014 2
ORDER
Dated this the 8th day of January, 2021 This review petition is filed to review the judgment in RSA No.1076 of 2012.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. After going through the impugned judgment and the grounds raised in the memorandum of review petition, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record in the impugned judgment. Hence, the review petition is without any merits and it is consequently dismissed.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS JUDGE ska