C.N.Subramanyan vs State Of Kerala

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 66 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
C.N.Subramanyan vs State Of Kerala on 4 January, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS

     MONDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 14TH POUSHA, 1942

                      WP(C).No.28994 OF 2020(Y)


PETITIONERS:

      1        C.N.SUBRAMANYAN, AGED 60 YEARS
               S/O. NARAYAN PANICKER, CHINKARATTU HOUSE, PATTANAKKAD
               MURI, PATTANAKKAD VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK,
               ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 531

      2        ADV.R.PURUSHOTHAMA SHENOY
               AGED 73 YEARS
               S/O. RAMA SHENOY, CHANIYIL HOUSE, PATTANAKKAD MURI,
               PATTANAKKAD VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK,
               ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 531

               BY ADVS.
               SMT.K.N.RAJANI
               SMT.ANILA PETER

RESPONDENTS:

      1        STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
               DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATION, SECRETARIAT,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001

      2        THE JOINT REGISTRAR,
               CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY (GENERAL),
               TECHI ANGALAMMAN COMPLEX, OPP ST.ANTONYS SCHOOL,
               THIRUVAMBADY, ALAPPUZHA-688 002

      3        PATTANAKKAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.1144,
               PATTANAKKAD, CHERTHALA P.O.,
               ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 531

               R3 BY ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR
               R3 BY ADV. SRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN

OTHER PRESENT:

               SR.GP SRI.BIMAL K NATH

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P(C).28994/2020
                                     2




                               JUDGMENT

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Senior Government Pleader.

It seems that, by Ext.P7 judgment, Ext.P4 common order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. It seems that the benefit should ensure to the petitioners herein. In the light of it, Ext.P4 to the extent it applies to the petitioner is set aside and the matter is remanded to the first respondent who shall rehear the appeal and pass fresh orders on merits within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment or along with the matters involved in Ext.P7 Writ Petition.

Sd/-

                                                SUNIL THOMAS

Sbna                                                JUDGE
 W.P(C).28994/2020
                               3




                         APPENDIX


PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1           TRUE COPY      OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND
                     RESPONDENT    IN CRP (1) 7882/2015 DATED
                     15.02.2019

EXHIBIT P2           TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PETITION FILED BY

THE PETITIONERS DATED 20.4.2019 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED 20.4.2019 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.GO (MS) 532/2020/CO-OP DATED 21.10.2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 30.11.2020 EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 30.11.2020 EXHIBIT P7 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.25247/2020, 26138/2020 AND 201203/2020 DATED 14.12.2020 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT