Shoba Kumar vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ...

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 555 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
Shoba Kumar vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ... on 7 January, 2021
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

                                   &

                 THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA

    THURSDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 17TH POUSHA, 1942

                        WP(Crl.).No.325 OF 2020


PETITIONER/S:

                SHOBA KUMAR,
                AGED 51 YEARS,
                S/O.SREEDHARAN, REVATHY NIVAS, PONNEZHA, THEKKEKARA
                VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

                BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SUNIL

RESPONDENT/S:

      1         THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                CHENGANNUR - 689 121.

      2         THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                KURATHIKADU POLICE STATION, KURATHIKAD - 690 107.

      3         THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                KURATHIKADU POLICE STATION, KURATHIKAD - 690 107.

      4         SOMAN, AGED 55 YEARS, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN, SOBU
                NIVAS, PONNEZHA, THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA,
                ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690 107.

      5         ADDL. R5. THE SUPERINTENDENT,
                DISTRICT HOSPITAL, MAVELIKKARA.

                **ADDL. R5 IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED
                04/01/2021 IN
                WP(CRL).325/2020.

                R1-3 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.B.RAMANAND




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
07.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(Crl.).No.325 OF 2020

                                   2




                               JUDGMENT

Dated this the 7th day of January 2021 K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

The writ petition was filed alleging that the employee of the petitioner has been restrained illegally and physically assaulted by the 4th respondent, who is her husband. On 29.12.2020, when the matter came up, a Division Bench directed an enquiry through a woman police officer. On 04.01.2021, when the matter came up, we were told by the learned Counsel that the detenue has been hospitalized and is now residing with a friend. It was also submitted that, the version of the police that she fell down and injured herself is not correct and there was definite assault by her husband. The learned Counsel also submitted before us that she will be present in court if required. We hence by order dated 04.01.2020, directed her presence and also directed the 3 rd respondent to file a statement specifically answering the allegations in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the writ petition. We also directed suo motu impleadment of the WP(Crl.).No.325 OF 2020 3 Superintndent Of District Hospital, Mavelikkara, where she was treated.

2. Today, a report of the Station House Officer, Kurathikad Police Station, has been filed along with a memo. The police alleged that the petitioner and the detenue had an illicit affair and while they were trying to elope, she fell down and injured herself. From the appearance of the petitioner and the difficulty she faced in walking, we are of the opinion that the injuries were not caused by a mere fall. We also notice the 'accident register-cum-wound certificate' produced along with the report which indicates the 'history and alleged cause of injury' to be 'assault by husband'. The petitioner is said to have been brought to the hospital by her own son. We are surprised that the S.H.O. has sought to file a report in the manner in which it is done. Atleast the wound certificate should have been perused before making such preposterous submissions before Court. We also interacted with the detenue who categorically states that she was assaulted but however is not ready to proceed with a complaint against her husband. She just wants to WP(Crl.).No.325 OF 2020 4 live peacefully and separated from her husband. We leave the detenue to either file a complaint or initiate other proceedings before the appropriate forum. We also direct that, in the event of any complaint being raised by the detenue of harassment or assault by the husband or children, the police shall immediately take cognizance of the same and avert commission of any such act.

We dispose of the writ petition with above directions.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/-

M.R.ANITHA JUDGE uu 07.01.2021 WP(Crl.).No.325 OF 2020 5 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 28/12/2020.