IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V.
WEDNESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 16TH POUSHA, 1942
Mat.Appeal.No.626 OF 2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.1.2009 IN OP 385/2008 OF FAMILY
COURT, KOTTAYAM AT ETTUMANOOR
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
ABRAHAM THOMAS @ TOMMY, AGED 46 YEARS
S/O.THOMAS, MUKALEL HOUSE, KANJIRAPPALLY P.O.,,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JACOB E SIMON
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
BINDU, AGED 41 YEARS,
D/O.P.J.CHACKO, PANACKEZHAM HOUSE, PERANNA,,
CHANGANACHERRY, NOW WORKING AT SWISS ATLIRA,
DEVELOPMENT S-L.L., P.O.BOX 1910, ALMOAYYED, TOWER,
2ND FLORE, SWITE 204, SEEF DISTRICT, KINGDOM OF
BEHARIN
BY ADV. SRI.GOKUL DAS V.V.H.
BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
06.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mat.A.No.626/2009
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 6th day of January, 2021 Shaffique, J This appeal is filed against the judgment dated 13.01.2009 in O.P.No.385/2008. By the impugned judgment, the Family Court had granted a decree of divorce and the marriage between the couple has been dissolved.
2. Learned counsel on either side submits that the parties have mutually settled the matter out of court and decided to live together.
3. In the light of the subsequent events, we are of the view that the judgment of the Family Court requires to the set aside in order to comply with the settlement arrived at. At a later stage, if the settlement does not work out, it is open for the parties to approach the Family Court.
Hence we set aside the judgment of the Family Court and the Mat.Appeal stands allowed.
Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE Sd/-
SHIRCY V.
kp True copy JUDGE
P.A. To Judge