IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 16TH POUSHA, 1942
WP(C).No.250 OF 2021(E)
PETITIONER/S:
SHAMEENA VAHAB, AGED 41 YEARS,
W/O.ABDUL VAHAB, MADATHUMPADDY HOUSE, ALLAPPRA P.O.,
VENGOLA, PERUMBAVOOR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM-
683556.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH M.P.
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION,
KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM-682013.
3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
MUVATTUPUZHA-686661.
4 THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PERUMBAVOOR-683542.
5 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VENGOLA-683556.
6 THE CONVENER, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE AND
AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, VENGOLA-683556.
7 VENGOLA GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
VENGOLA-6835556, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
8 AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, VENGOLA KRISHI BHAVAN,
CONVENER LLMC-683556.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.S.GOPINATHAN
BY SRI.C.A.NAVAS FOR PANCHAYATH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.250/2021 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 6th day of January 2021 The petitioner approached the Local Level Monitoring Committee, Vengola to remove her land described in the application from the data bank. According to the petitioner, the land belonging to her comprised in Re-survey No.217/9/2 is a dry land and therefore, inclusion in the data bank is not correct.
2. Taking note of the pendency of the application made by the petitioner before the Local Level Monitoring Committee, it is appropriate to direct the Local Level Monitoring Committee to consider and pass orders on the application after conducting an inspection and notice to the petitioner, within a period of three months.
3. In view of the above direction, the application before the third respondent under Form-5 need to be considered only if the Local Level Monitoring Committee declines the petitioner's request. In the event, the WP(C).No.250/2021 3 Local Level Monitoring Committee declines, the third respondent shall consider Form-5 application after adverting to the decision of the Local Level Monitoring Committee.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE ln WP(C).No.250/2021 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.4443/19 DATED 04.12.2019 OF SRO, PERUMBAVOOR. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR 2020-21. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 8TH RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE