IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 15TH POUSHA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.2164 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 23002/2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23002/2020(A) OF HIGH
COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS:
1 E.P. VARGHESE, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O
PAUL,ERINJERI HOUSE,EAST FORT, THRISSUR
DISTRICT-680 005.
2 SANITHA SUBHASH N.L, AGED 41 YEARS
D/O LALAPPAN,KALLADATHIL HOUSE,
ATHANI NAGAR,KOZHUKKULLI.P.O, THRISSUR-680
751.
BY ADVS.
SRI.A.R.NIMOD
SRI.M.A.AUGUSTINE
RESPONDENTS:
1 VINU C. KUNJAPPAN, S/O KUNJAPPAN,AGE NOT KNOWN
SECRETARY,THRISSUR CORPORATION,
THRISSUR-680001.
2 SURESH KUMAR PEROTH, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT
KNOWN, HEALTH SUPERVISOR,THRISSUR
CORPORATION,THRISSUR-680 001.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 05.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No.2164 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 23002/2020
..2..
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 5th day of January 2021 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents that licence has been issued. However, it is submitted that the 1st respondent demanded property tax assessment return within 24 hours, as per Annexure D.
2. This Court, in fact, observed in the judgment itself that such demands can be raised only in accordance with law. Therefore, the petitioners can be granted 30 days time for the above purpose.
3. In such circumstances, it is made clear that no coercive steps shall be taken based on Annexure D, till the expiry of the statutory time period.
With the above observation, the contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE PR Con.Case(C).No.2164 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 23002/2020 ..3..
APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C)NO.23002/2020 DATED 30.11.2020. ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 14.10.2020.
ANNEXURE C TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER GIVEN BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 08.12.2020 ANNEXURE D TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 15.12.2020.