IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 30TH MAGHA,1942
Con.Case(C).No.1425 OF 2017(S) IN WP(C). 14700/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 14700/2017 DATED 28-04-2017 OF HIGH COURT
OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION:
MAIMOONATH K.
AGED 46 YEARS,W/O.HYDERALI,KANHIRANMUTTAM
HOUSE,PULLIYIL,NALLAMTHANNI,NILAMBUR,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 330.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.BALAGOPAL
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO. 2 IN THE WRIT PETITION:
RAHIMKUTTY Y.
(AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER),SECRETARY,KURULAI GRAMA
PANCHAYATH,KURULAI.P.O,MALAPPURAMDISTRICT-679 330.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
19.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.O.(C) No. 1425/2017
in W.P.(C) No. 14700/2017
Dated this the 19th day of February, 2021.
JUDGMENT
This Contempt Case is filed complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 28.04.2017 in W.P.(C) No. 14700 of 2017 is not complied with.
2. A detailed counter affidavit is placed by the respondent before this Court and along with the same, the decision taken by the Grama Panchayat and the orders passed in respect of the application submitted by the petitioner seeking employment in the Panchayat on contract basis in the post of Data Entry Operator are also produced.
In that view of the matter, I do not think, anything survives to be considered in this Contempt Case, since already the directions are complied with. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.
Rv