The National And Rural Education vs The State Of Karnataka

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2779 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

The National And Rural Education vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2026

                                                 -1-
                                                             NC: 2026:KHC:17521
                                                          WP NO.18824 OF 2024


                      HC-KAR


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                                DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
                             WRIT PETITION NO.18824 OF 2024 (EDN-RES)
                      BETWEEN:
                      THE NATIONAL AND RURAL EDUCATION
                      ASSOCIATION (R.)
                      (SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER
                      THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT)
                      GOWRIBIDANUR ROAD,
                      MANCHENAHALLI,
                      GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK,
                      CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
                      REP. BY ITS HONORARY SECRETARY,
                      SRI. G.N. NAGARAJ.
                                                               ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. B.M. HALA SWAMY, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:
                      1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND
                            SECONDARY EDUCATION,
                            M.S. BUILDING,
Digitally signed by
CHAYA S A                   BENGALURU - 560 001.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA             2.    THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS
                            K.R. CIRCLE,
                            BENGALURU.

                      3.    THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF
                            PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM.)
                            DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
                            CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.

                      4.    JOINT DIRECTOR (ADM.)
                            DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
                            CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
                                -2-
                                             NC: 2026:KHC:17521
                                          WP NO.18824 OF 2024


HC-KAR


5.   THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER
     DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND
     SECONDARY EDUCATION,
     GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK,
     CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
                                                ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET-
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21ST JUNE, 2024 PASSED BY THE
RESPONDENT NO.2 IN APPEAL NO.3/2024(220578) VIDE
ANNEXURE-H; SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 06TH APRIL, 2024
PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE ANNEXURE-G,
DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE RENEWAL
OF RECOGNITION OF THE NANDANA HIGHER PRIMARY
SCHOOL FOR CLASSES 6TH TO 8TH STANDARD FOR ACADEMIC
YEAR 2024-25; AND ETC.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH

                          ORAL ORDER

In this writ petition, the petitioner-Society is challenging the order dated 21st June, 2024 (Annexure-H) passed by the respondent No.3 in Appeal No.3/2024 (220578) and order dated 06th April, 2024 (Annexure-G) passed by the respondent No.3, wherein the recognition granted to the institution of the petitioner as per Registration Certificate bearing No.101061/2022-23 dated 19th March, 2022 for 6th to 8th Standard was cancelled.

-3-

NC: 2026:KHC:17521 WP NO.18824 OF 2024 HC-KAR

2. Heard Sri. B.M. Hala Swamy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. B. Sukanya Baliga, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents.

3. Having taken note of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, I have carefully considered the reasons assigned by the respondent No.3 in order dated 06th April, 2024 (Annexure-G) as well as by the respondent No.2 in order dated 21st June, 2024 (Annexure-H). On perusal of the order dated 06th April, 2024 (Annexure-G), the same would indicate that the respondent No.2 had taken decision against the institution of the petitioner based on the complaint filed by the third party to the proceedings on the ground that the Managing Committee of the petitioner had provided fake documents and information to secure the recognition for the institution.

4. In this regard, the petitioner had produced relevant material to establish that the petitioner-Society had constructed the new building and as per the complaint report dated 05th June, 2024 (Annexure-J) along with the photographs produced -4- NC: 2026:KHC:17521 WP NO.18824 OF 2024 HC-KAR at Annexures 'J' and 'K' series, which would indicate that the petitioner had constructed new building for the purpose of imparting education to children in the Village. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that the reasons assigned by the respondent-Authorities in respect of withdrawing the recognition granted to the institution of the petitioner requires to be set-aside.

5. Under these circumstances, I am of the view that the respondent No.3 shall conduct a spot inspection of the institution in question where the new building is being constructed and classes are being running and thereafter take decision in the matter in terms of provisions contained under the Karnataka Education Act. It is important to note that the respondent-Authorities shall act upon the provisions of the Karnataka Education Act and Rules and do not give much importance to the frivolous complaints filed by the private parties for their whims and fancies. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER
(i) Writ Petition allowed; -5-

NC: 2026:KHC:17521 WP NO.18824 OF 2024 HC-KAR

(ii) Order dated 21st June, 2024 (Annexure-H) passed by the respondent No.2 in Appeal No.3/2024 and order dated 06th April, 2024 (Annexure-G) passed by the respondent No.3 are hereby set-aside; consequently, order dated 06th March, 2026 (Annexure-R) passed by the respondent No.5 is set-aside.

(iii) The respondent No.3 is directed to conduct spot inspection of the institution in question and take decision in the matter in accordance with law for renewal of recognition of the institution for classes 6th to 8th Standard, without there being influenced by any complaint filed by the third party, who is not connected with the affairs of the institution in question.

SD/-

(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6