Karnataka High Court
Babu S/O Kallappa Naik vs The Deputy Commissioner on 16 March, 2026
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC-D:4069
WP No. 107749 of 2017
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M
WRIT PETITION NO. 107749 OF 2017 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
1. BABU S/O KALLAPPA NAIK,
AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: METAGUDD, TQ: MUDHOL,
DIST: BAGALKOT.
2. NINGAPPA S/O MALLAPPA NAIK,
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: METAGUDD, TQ: MUDHOL,
DIST: BAGALKOT.
(FATHER NAME IS WRONGLY
SHOWN AS KALLAPPA).
3. VENKAPPA S/O KALLAPPA NAIK,
AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: METAGUDD, TQ: MUDHOL,
DIST: BAGALKOT.
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.MAHANTESH.R.PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed
by
PREMCHANDRA
MR
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BAGALKOT, TQ. AND DIST: BAGALKOT.
2. THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANT
TO DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF
LAND REFORMS, BAGALKOT,
BAGALKOT, TQ. AND DIST: BAGALKOT.
3. THE TAHSILDAR,
MUDHOL, TQ: MUDHOL,
DIST: BAGALKOT.
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC-D:4069
WP No. 107749 of 2017
HC-KAR
4. THE ADLR, JAMKHANDI,
TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT.
5. HANAMANTH S/O SHIVANAND WALIKAR,
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: METAGUDD, TQ: MUDHOL,
DIST: BAGALKOT, NOW R/O: CHANNAL,
TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.
6. HANAMANTH S/O PANDAPPA NAIK,
AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: METAGUDD, TQ: MUDHOL,
DIST: BAGALKOT, NOW R/O: CHANNAL,
TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. MALA.B.BHUTE, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;
WP AS AGAINST R4-R5 IS ABATED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Mahantesh R.Patil., counsel for the petitioners and Smt.Mala B.Bhute., AGA for respondents 1 to 4 have appeared in person.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the memo. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn in terms of memo. When queried, counsel for the -3- NC: 2026:KHC-D:4069 WP No. 107749 of 2017 HC-KAR petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition in terms of memo.
The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of memo.
Because of disposal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/-
(JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 59