Sri Chidananda M vs State Of Karnataka

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 952 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Chidananda M vs State Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                   -1-
                                                               NC: 2026:KHC:7096
                                                         CRL.P No. 16178 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16178 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC) /
                                             482(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      SRI. CHIDANANDA M
                      S/O MANJEGOWDA
                      AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
                      RESIDING AT HONNAKUMARANAHALLI
                      LALANAKERE POST, GANDASI HOBLI
                      ARSIKERE TALUK
                      HASSAN DISTRICT-573 164
                                                                    ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. H.V. PRAVEEN GOWDA, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      BY HASSAN CITY P.S.
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA       REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH        HIGH COURT COMPLEX
COURT OF
KARNATAKA             AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
                      BENGALURU-560 001
                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP)

                           THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C
                      (FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO GRANT
                      BAIL BY DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO ENLARGE
                      THE PETITIONER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN THE EVENT OF
                      THE ARREST IN CR.NO.154/2025 REGISTERED IN HASSAN CITY
                      POLICE STATION FOR AN ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE
                      UNDER SECTIONS 316(4),318(3),318(4) OF BNS PENDING ON
                                 -2-
                                             NC: 2026:KHC:7096
                                      CRL.P No. 16178 of 2025


HC-KAR




THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT
HASSAN.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                        ORAL ORDER

1. This petition is filed by accused No. 1 under Section 482 of BNSS praying to grant anticipatory bail in Crime No. 154/2025 of Hassan City Police Station registered for offence punishable under Sections 316(4), 318(3), 318(4) of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned HCGP for respondent - State.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend that as on the date of alleged offence, petitioner was not working in the office, he had been transferred and in his place accused No. 2 was working as Taluka Nodal Officer. Petitioner is not involved in commission of any offence as alleged. It is accused No. 3 - District Nodal Officer who is involved in commission of the offence. Petitioner is ready -3- NC: 2026:KHC:7096 CRL.P No. 16178 of 2025 HC-KAR to cooperate with the Investigating Officer in investigation. The offences alleged against the petitioner are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. With this, he prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that petitioner is directly involved in commission of the offence. Investigation is in progress and petitioner is required for custodial interrogation. With this, he prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties the Court has perused the FIR, complaint and other materials placed on record.

6. This Court while granting anticipatory bail to accused No. 2 in the order dated 07.01.2026 passed in Crl.P. No. 16113/2025 has observed as under:

"6. On perusal of averments of the complaint, there is an allegation against accused -4- NC: 2026:KHC:7096 CRL.P No. 16178 of 2025 HC-KAR Nos.1 to 3 that they have transferred Rs.7.5 lakhs in total to non-beneficiaries and mis- appropriated the amount. The matter is under investigation. What is the role of this petitioner is to be ascertained in the investigation. The offences alleged against the petitioner are not punishable either with death or imprisonment or life. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. The petitioner has undertaken to co- operate with the IO in the investigation and abide by any conditions to be imposed by this court."

7. Petitioner has been transferred and in his place accused No. 2 was posted. Considering the said aspect, petitioner is also placed similar to that of accused No. 2 who has been granted anticipatory bail. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. The offences alleged against the petitioner are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life. Petitioner has undertaken to cooperate with the Investigating Officer in the investigation and abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. -5-

NC: 2026:KHC:7096 CRL.P No. 16178 of 2025 HC-KAR

8. Considering the above aspects, petitioner has made out case for grant of anticipatory bail with conditions.

In the result of the following ORDER Petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.154/2025 of Hassan City Police Station subject to following conditions:

1. Petitioner shall voluntarily appear before the Investigating Officer within 10 days from this day and execute bail bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer.
2. Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called for and cooperate in the investigation.
3. Petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case -6- NC: 2026:KHC:7096 CRL.P No. 16178 of 2025 HC-KAR so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21