Karnataka High Court
Rakesh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 February, 2026
Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC:12260
CRL.P No. 256 of 2026
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 256 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC)
/ 483(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1. RAKESH
S/O CHANDRA NAIK,
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
R/AT NO.126/16, 6TH CROSS,
KADIRAPPA ROAD, COX TOWN,
BENGALURU-560005
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.G RAJENDRA REDDY., ADVOCATE
FOR SRI GOUTHAM M.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BANGARPET POLICE STATION,
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA REPRESENTED BY
MURTHY RAJASHRI STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001
2. MANJULA
W/O ARUN KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT NEAR MUBARAK SHADI MAHAL,
KHADER LAYOUT,
BANGARPET TOWN-563114
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC:12260
CRL.P No. 256 of 2026
HC-KAR
R2 SERVED, UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
CR.P.C (FILED U/S.483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL FOR THE OFFENCE
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 137(2),64(2)(m) OF BNS 2023
R/W SEC.6 OF POCSO ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
HONBLE FILE OF THE ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
FTSC I (POCSO) AT KOLAR, IN SPL.C(POCSO) NO.104/2025
DATED 23.12.2025 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT
BANGARPET POLICE IN CRIME NO. 256/2025.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed by sole accused under Section 483 of BNSS to grant bail in Crime No.256/2025 of Bangarapet Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m) of Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act.
2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1/State.
-3-
NC: 2026:KHC:12260 CRL.P No. 256 of 2026 HC-KAR
3. In spite of service of notice, respondent No.2 remained absent and unrepresented.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend that the victim girl in her statement recorded under Section 183 of BNSS has stated that she is having love affair with the petitioner, and on coming to know the same, her parents have scolded her, and therefore, she on her own left the house, went to Bangalore, and met the petitioner, who took her to his house. The doctor, who examined the victim girl, has noted that hymen of the victim girl appears normal. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 03.09.2025, and as a charge sheet is filed, he is not required for further custodial interrogation. With this, he prayed to allow the petition.
5. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1/State would contend that the victim girl in her statement recorded under Section 183 of BNSS has specifically stated the forcible act of sexual -4- NC: 2026:KHC:12260 CRL.P No. 256 of 2026 HC-KAR intercourse by this petitioner on her. The charge sheet materials show a prima facie case against the petitioner for the offences alleged against him. With this, he prayed to reject the petition.
6. Having heard the learned counsel, the Court has perused the charge sheet and other materials placed on record.
7. On perusal of the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 183 of BNSS, she has stated that she is having love affair with the petitioner, and as her family members scolded her in that regard, she went to Bangalore and met the petitioner. The victim girl is aged 17 years, and she is of the age of understanding the consequences of her acts. The doctor, who examined the victim girl has noted that hymen of the victim girl appears normal. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 03.09.2025, and as a charge sheet is filed, he is not -5- NC: 2026:KHC:12260 CRL.P No. 256 of 2026 HC-KAR required for further interrogation. The petitioner is stated to be student aged 19 years and so also the victim girl.
8. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner has made out a case for grant of bail with conditions.
In the result, the following:
ORDER
i) The petition is allowed.
ii) The petitioner is granted bail in Crime No.256/2025 of Bangarapet Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Section 137(2), 64(2)(m) of Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act subject to following conditions.
a) The petitioner shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.
b) The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.-6-
NC: 2026:KHC:12260 CRL.P No. 256 of 2026 HC-KAR
c) The petitioner shall attend the Trial Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted and cooperate for speedy disposal of the case.
Sd/-
(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE BKM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13