Sri Kallesh S vs State By

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1670 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Kallesh S vs State By on 23 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                 -1-
                                                              NC: 2026:KHC:10986
                                                          CRL.P No. 129 of 2026


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                             DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                        CRIMINAL PETITION No. 129 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                         483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SRI KALLESH S
                            S/O. SHANKARAIAH,
                            AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
                            R/O CHIKKA ANKANAHALLI VILLAGE,
                            HATHAKURU HOBLI,
                            MADDURU TALUK,
                            MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 415

                          PERMANENTLY R/AT KANNASANDY VILLAGE,
                          YEDIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK,
                          TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 130
                          UNDER JUDICIAL CUSTODY FROM 05.12.2025
                                                                ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH V B, ADVOCATE)
                      AND:

                      1.    STATE BY
Digitally signed by         RAJAGOPAL NAGAR POLICE STATION,
LAKSHMINARAYANA             NO.137, RAJAGOPALNAGAR MAIN ROAD,
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH              3RD CROSS, KG NAGAR, LAGGERE,
COURT OF                    BENGALURU - 560 058
KARNATAKA

                          REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                          HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING,
                          BENGALURU - 560001
                                                              ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SMT.WAHEEDA.M.M, HCGP)
                           THIS CRL.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C
                      (UNDER SECTION 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO GRANT REGULAR
                      BAIL TO THE PETITIONER HEREIN BY DIRECTING THE
                      RESPONDENT-RAJAGOPAL NAGAR P.S., BENGALURU DISTRICT,
                                 -2-
                                               NC: 2026:KHC:10986
                                           CRL.P No. 129 of 2026


HC-KAR




TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO CR.NO.
436/2025 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT-RAJAGOPAL
NAGAR P.S., BENGALURU, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTION 305 OF BNS, 2023, PENDING ON THE FILE
OF THE 31st ACMM COURT, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                         ORAL ORDER

1. This petition is filed by the sole accused under Section 483 of BNSS praying to grant bail in Crime No. 436/2025 of Rajagopal Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru, registered for offence under Section 305 of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned HCGP for respondent - State.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend that FIR is registered against unknown person. Name of the petitioner has not been shown in the complaint and FIR. Petitioner has been arrested on suspicion. There is recovery of golden mangalya chain weighing 50 gms at the instance of this petitioner. As major portion of investigation is over petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. With this he prayed to allow the petition.

-3-

NC: 2026:KHC:10986 CRL.P No. 129 of 2026 HC-KAR

4. Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that chargesheet has been filed against this petitioner for offence under Section 305 of BNS. Offence alleged against the petitioner is provided with punishment of imprisonment which may extend to 7 years. There is recovery of stolen golden mangalya chain at the instance of this petitioner from one Manoj to whom this petitioner had sold the said chain. Petitioner has been identified by the eyewitnesses. Petitioner is having criminal antecedents and involved in 13 cases and out of them, 10 cases are still pending. Details of the said cases is as under:

a) Cr. No. 29/2024 - Govindaraj Nagar P.S. under Sections 457, 380
b) Cr. No. 152/2024 - Kempegowda P.S. under Section 305
c) Cr. No. 318/2018 - Konankunte P.S. under Section 380
d) Cr. No. 405/2018 - Konankunte P.S. under Section 380
- acquitted
e) Cr. No. 51/2018 - K.P. Agrahara P.S. - Acquitted
f) Cr. No. 11/2018 - K.P. Agrahara P.S. - Acquitted
g) Cr. No. 196/2017 - K.P. Agrahara P.S. - Acquitted
h) Cr. No. 215/2017 - K.P. Agrahara P.S. - Acquitted
i) Cr. No. 216/2017 - K.P. Agrahara P.S. - Acquitted
j) Cr. No. 620/2017 - Vijayanagara P.S. - Compromised -4- NC: 2026:KHC:10986 CRL.P No. 129 of 2026 HC-KAR
k) Cr. No. 667/2017 - Vijayanagar P.S. - Compromised
l) Cr. No. 357/2018 - Konanakunte P.S. - Acquitted
m) Cr. No. 231/2015 - Tumakuru Kunigal P.S. -

Compromised

5. If the petitioner is granted bail there are chances of he committing similar offence. With this she prayed to reject the petition.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court has perused the FIR, complaint and other materials placed on record.

7. There was theft in the temple of 60 gms golden mangalya chain on 26.11.2025. At the instance of this petitioner 50 gms golden mangalya chain has been recovered from one Manoj. Petitioner had sold the said golden mangalya chain stolen in the temple to the said Manoj. Considering the said aspect and on perusal of the chargesheet material, there is prima facie case against the petitioner for the offence alleged against him. The offence alleged against the petitioner is provided with punishment of imprisonment which may extend to 7 years. Petitioner is having criminal antecedents and he is -5- NC: 2026:KHC:10986 CRL.P No. 129 of 2026 HC-KAR involved in 13 cases. If the petitioner is granted bail there are chances of he repeating similar offence and flee from justice.

8. Considering the above aspects, petitioner has not made out any grounds for grant of bail.

In the result, petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46