Chandrashekar B K vs State Of Karnataka By

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1167 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Chandrashekar B K vs State Of Karnataka By on 12 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                   -1-
                                                               NC: 2026:KHC:8621
                                                         CRL.P No. 17207 of 2025


                       HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                                CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17207 OF 2025
                                     [(438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS)]
                      BETWEEN:

                      CHANDRASHEKAR B.K.
                      AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
                      S/O. LATE. V. KRISHNAPPA,
                      RESIDING AT NO.161, GROUND FLOOR,
                      NRUPATHUNGA NAGAR, KOTHANURU MAIN ROAD,
                      J.P. NAGAR VII PHASE,
                      BENGALURU -560 078.


                                                                   ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. NARAYANA REDDY M., ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA       ANEKAL POLICE,
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH        ANEKAL - 562 105,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA             (REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                      HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, AMBEDKAR VEEDI,
                      BENGALURU - 560 001).


                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP)

                           THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 (FILED UNDER
                      SECTION 482 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO PASS ON ORDER
                      GRANTING ANTICIPAOTY BAIL THEREBY DIRECGTING THE
                      RESPONDEDENT POLICE TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER IN
                             -2-
                                            NC: 2026:KHC:8621
                                  CRL.P No. 17207 of 2025


HC-KAR




CRIME NO.379/2025 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 316(4), 336(3), 318(4), 336(2), 340(2) READ WITH
SECTION 3(5) OF BNS AND SECTION 192(A) OF KARNATAKA
LAND REVENUE ACT OF THE RESPONDENT ANEKAL POLICE,
PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
(Jr.Dn.) AND JMFC, ANEKAL TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON
BAIL.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                      ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused No.5 under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to grant anticipatory bail in Crime No.379/2025 of Anekal Police Station registered for offences punishable under Section 192(A) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and Sections 316(4), 336(3), 318(4), 336(2), 340(2) read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent - State.

-3-

NC: 2026:KHC:8621 CRL.P No. 17207 of 2025 HC-KAR

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend that, at the relevant point of time when the offence has taken place, the petitioner was not working in Anekal. There is no role of this petitioner in missing of the documents. The petitioner is not the custodian of the documents. Accused Nos.1, 2, 4, 7, 13 and 15 have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Therefore, the petitioner is also entitled for grant of anticipatory bail on the ground of parity. The petitioner is ready to cooperate with the Investigating Officer in investigation and abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. With these, he prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent would contend that, the investigation is in progress and the offences alleged against the petitioner is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven (7) years. The allegation against the accused persons is helping the land grabbers by creating and forging the documents and missing of -4- NC: 2026:KHC:8621 CRL.P No. 17207 of 2025 HC-KAR records from the office. With these, he prayed for dismissal of the petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsels appearing for parties, the Court has perused the FIR, complaint and other materials placed on record.

6. This Court while granting anticipatory bail to accused Nos.1, 2, 4, 7, 13 and 15 in the order dated 19.01.2026 passed in Criminal Petition No.17369/2025 and other connected matters, has observed as under:

10. The FIR was registered on 28.11.2025 alleging commission of offence between 14.10.2025 and 28.11.2025. The allegation in the complaint pertains to the missing of certain documents and the creation of documents. The question as to who was the custodian of the said documents at the relevant point of time is a matter of record. The offences alleged against the petitioners are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life. The petitioners have undertaken to cooperate with the Investigating Officer in investigation and abide -5- NC: 2026:KHC:8621 CRL.P No. 17207 of 2025 HC-KAR by any conditions to be imposed by this Court.

There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners.

7. The petitioner who was working as a Deputy Tahsildar in Anekal is also similarly placed to that of the other accused persons who have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. The petitioner is ready to cooperate with the Investigating Officer in investigation and abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. The offences alleged against the petitioner are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner.

8. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail with conditions. In the result, the following;

ORDER The Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted anticipatory bail in Crime No.379/2025 of Anekal -6- NC: 2026:KHC:8621 CRL.P No. 17207 of 2025 HC-KAR Police Station and is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest, subject to following conditions:

i) The petitioner shall voluntarily appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days from this day and execute bail bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with one surety for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.
ii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer in investigation.
iii) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called for.
iv) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.
v) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on first and third Sunday of every month, for a period of two -7- NC: 2026:KHC:8621 CRL.P No. 17207 of 2025 HC-KAR months or till filing of the final report, whichever is earlier.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29