Union Bank Of India vs The Warehouseing Development And

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8890 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Union Bank Of India vs The Warehouseing Development And on 26 September, 2025

Author: Suraj Govindaraj
Bench: Suraj Govindaraj
                                               -1-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC-D:13528
                                                       WP No. 103051 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD

                   DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

                                         BEFORE

                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

                   WRIT PETITION NO. 103051 OF 2025 (GM-RES)

                     BETWEEN:

                     UNION BANK OF INDIA
                     HAVING ITS REGISTERED HEAD OFFICE AT
                     MUMBAI, AND ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT
                     HUBBALLI, R/BY. ITS DEPUTY REGIONAL HEAD
                     NAMELY SRI. RITESH KUMAR,
                     AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. DEPUTY REGIONAL MANAGER,
                     UNION BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE,
                     HUBBALLI-580030.
                                                                ...PETITIONER
                     (BY SRI. GIRISH S. HULMANI, ADVOCATE)

                     AND:
Digitally signed
by GIRIJA A.         1.   THE WAREHOUSEING DEVELOPMENT AND
BYAHATTI                  REGULATORY AUTHORITY,
Location: High            4TH FLOOR, NCUI BUILDING,
Court of
Karnataka,                3, SIRI INSTITUTIONAL AREA,
Dharwad Bench,            AUGUST KRANTI MARG, HAUZ KHAS,
Dharwad
                          NEW DELHI-110016,
                          R/BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

                     2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
                          OFFICE OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
                          HAVERI DISTRICT, HAVERI-581110.

                     3.   THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                          HAVERI DIST, HAVERI-581110.
                              -2-
                                        NC: 2025:KHC-D:13528
                                      WP No. 103051 of 2025


HC-KAR




4.  M/S. SHREE KOLLUR MOOKAMBIKA WAREHOUSE
    REP. BY ITS PROP. SMT. BHAGYAMMA
    W/O. NAGARAJ CHALAGERI,
    KODAMAGGI VILLAGE, SHIKARIPUR ROAD,
    MASUR POST, TQ. RATTIHALLI,
    DIST. HAVERI-581210.
                                          ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRIYUTHS. SIDDAPPA S. SAJJAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
    SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R2 AND R3;
    SANTOSH B. MALLIGWAD, ADVOCATE FOR R4)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A. THIS
HON BLE COURT MAY KINDLY BE PLEASED TO PASS AN ORDER
IN THE FORM OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESP NO. 1 TO
TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE RESP. NO. 4 UNDER
THE PROVISIONS OF WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT AND
REGULATION ACT, 2007 AND REPORT THE SAME TO THIS HON
BLE COURT. B. DIRECT THE MANDAMUS DIRECTING RESP. NO.1
TO   TAKE   NECESSARY    ACTION   ON   THE   PETITIONER
REPRESENTATIONS AND ETC.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


                          ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

a. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass an order in the form of Mandamus directing the Resp No. 1 to take necessary action against the Resp. No. 4 under the provisions of Warehouse Development -3- NC: 2025:KHC-D:13528 WP No. 103051 of 2025 HC-KAR and Regulation Act, 2007 and report the same to this Hon'ble Court.

b. Direct the mandamus directing Resp. No.1 to take necessary action on the petitioner representations. c. Any other order which deems fits in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.

2. The lis in the present matter is relating to the role of the Warehousing Development Authority and the obligations on the part of the warehouse men, which has been decided by this Court in the detailed order dated 17.09.2025 in W.P.No.101644/2025 in the case of Canara Bank Vs. The Warehousing Development and Regulatory Authority and Another.

3. For the very same reasons as stated in the said judgment, I pass the following:

ORDER i. Writ petition is allowed. -4-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13528 WP No. 103051 of 2025 HC-KAR ii. Mandamus is issued, Respondent No.1 is directed to take necessary action in terms of the order dated 17.09.2025 passed in W.P.No.101644/2025, within the same time frame as fixed therein. The jurisdictional Superintendent of Police shall provide necessary assistance.
Sd/-
(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE gab CT:PA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 94