Karnataka High Court
J C Flowers Asset Reconstructions Co Pvt ... vs Jaiananda C B on 25 October, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:42408
CRL.A No. 2027 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2027 OF 2024 (A)
BETWEEN:
J C FLOWERS ASSET
RECONSTRUCTIONS CO. PVT. LTD.,
(ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS
TRUSTEE OF JCF YES TRUST 2022-23/1),
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
THE COMPANIES ACT, REGISTERED AS 2013
AND AN ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PURSUANT TO SECTION 3 OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002
AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
12TH FLOOR, CROMPTON GREAVES HOUSE,
DR. ANNIE BESANT ROAD, WORLI,
MUMBAI, 400030, MAHARASHTRA
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. MANIMARAN S.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI S SUSHANT VENKATESH PAI, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYAN AND:
N
Location: HIGH
COURT OF JAIANANDA C B,
KARNATAKA
SECURITAS PVT. LTD.,
NO. 2-3, 4TH CROSS, EAST OF NGEF LAYOUT,
KASTURI NAGAR, BANGALORE- 560043.
ALSO AT:
JAIANAND C.B.
2/3-2, NEAR RAMESHWARAM TEMPLE,
DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE-560045.
ALSO AT:
JAIANAND C.B.
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:42408
CRL.A No. 2027 of 2024
HC-KAR
SECURITAS PVT. LTD., NO. 2-3,
4TH CROSS, EAST OF NGEF LAYOUT,
KASTURI NAGAR, BANGALORE- 560043.
...RESPONDENT
(SERVICE OF NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS D/WITH
V/O/DT 25.10.2025)
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO
a) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 19.08.2024 PASSED
BY THE LEARNED XIX ACMM AND ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES
JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT, BENGALURU (SCCH-17) IN
CC.NO.7276/2021. b) CONSEQUENTLY RESTORE
CC.NO.7276/2021 TO THE FILE OF THE LEARNED XIX ACMM
AND ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT,
BENGALURU (SCCH-17).c) GRANT COSTS OF THESE
PROCEEDINGS.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. The appellant who is the complainant has filed the complaint under Section 138 of NI Act. The Trial Court has taken cognizance against the accused for the offence under Section 138 of NI Act and case came to be registered in C.C.No.7276/2021. On 19.08.2024, the trial Court has passed the following order: -3-
NC: 2025:KHC:42408 CRL.A No. 2027 of 2024 HC-KAR Complainant present.
Learned counsel for the complainant prays time to take steps. Sufficient time already granted. Inspite of repeated issuance of NBW, the complainant is not taking steps to secure the accused. In the last date of hearing on the request of complainant, it was ordered to Issue NBW by the hands of complainant which shall be executed through jurisdictional police. Even though the NBW is ready it is not collected and it shows that the complainant is reluctant to take steps. No PF is paid and praying for time to take steps. The case is pending from 2021. Hence, no grounds are made out, prayer rejected. In the result the case is dismissed for default.
3. Further, a perusal of the order dated 16.07.2024, it is clear that the complainant has paid PF. The trial Court has passed an order of re-issue NBW to the accused by hands of the complainant, which shall be executed through the jurisdictional police. When the Court has issued NBW to the accused, the same has to be executed through concerned police. In view of the Rule 8 of Chapter 3 of the Karnataka Criminal Rules of Practice, 1968, all processes shall be served or executed by the -4- NC: 2025:KHC:42408 CRL.A No. 2027 of 2024 HC-KAR police, unless the Court which issues the process, otherwise directs. Even if the accused was issued with NBW by the Court, it has to be executed through concerned police. It is not possible to execute non-bailable warrant by the complainant. When the Court has issued NBW to the accused, it is the duty of the concerned police to receive the non-bailable warrant from the Court. The non-collection of the NBW by the complainant is not a genuine ground to dismiss the case. Though the complainant counsel sought time to take steps, the learned Magistrate rejected the prayer of the complainant, which is not sustainable under law. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:
ORDER
i) Appeal is allowed;
ii) The order dated 19.08.2024 passed by the XI Addl. SCJ and ACMM at Bangalore City in C.C No.7276/2021 is set aside;-5-
NC: 2025:KHC:42408 CRL.A No. 2027 of 2024 HC-KAR
iii) The case in C.C No.7276/2021 on the file of XI Addl. SCJ and ACMM at Bangalore City shall be restored;
iv) The Trial Court is directed to proceed with the case in accordance with law;
v) The complainant shall appear before the Court without seeking any further notice from the trial Court on 18.11.2025.
vi) Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the trial Court for taking necessary action.
Sd/-
(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39