Karnataka High Court
Shantaram S/O Laxman Savant vs Pundalik S/O Dattu Patil on 17 October, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:14085
MFA No. 102058 of 2014
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102058 OF 2014 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SHANTARAM
S/O. LAXMAN SAVANT,
AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: H.NO.48, MALANKALE,
PO: IDALHOND, TAL: KHANAPUR,
DIST: BELGAUM.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRASADKUMAR GUNAKI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
GIRIJA A. 1. PUNDALIK
BYAHATTI
S/O. DATTU PATIL,
Digitally signed by
GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI
Location: HIGH
AGE: 37 YEARS,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DHARWAD
OCC: AGRICULTURE COOLIE,
C/O: KALLAPPA PARASHURAM PATIL,
R/O: KANGRALI, TAL & DIST: BELGAUM.
2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
NEAR KOLHAPUR CIRCLE,
K.L.E. HOSPITAL ROAD, BELGAUM.
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:14085
MFA No. 102058 of 2014
HC-KAR
3. MAHESH NARAYAN SHIMANAGOUDAR,
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O. DEVALATTI, TQ: KHANAPUR,
DIST: BELAGAVI.
AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT AS
PER THE ORDER DATED 25.07.2016
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SANJAY S. KATAGERI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. SURESH S. GUNDI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. HARISH S. MAIGUR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR
VEHICLE ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
AWARD DATED 03/03/2014 IN M.V.C.NO.2748/2012 PASSED BY
THE FAST TRACK COURT II AND MEMBER ADDITIONAL M.A.C.T.
BELGAUM, BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND DISMISS THE
PETITION AGAINST THE APPELLANT HEREIN AND ALSO REDUCE
THE COMPENSATION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:14085
MFA No. 102058 of 2014
HC-KAR
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) No representation on the appellant's side on call. There was no representation on the appellant's side even on 10.09.2025 and 08.10.2025. Though the matter is list under the caption 'for dismissal', yet there is no representation on this day. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. Amount if any deposited be transmitted to the concerned Tribunal immediately.
Sd/-
(CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE RH CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9