Karnataka High Court
Ramangouda vs Naglisab on 16 October, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13998
RSA No. 1133 of 2007
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1133 OF 2007 (SP)
BETWEEN:
1. RAMANGOUDA
S/O. BASANAGOUDA PATIL,
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.,
1A. GEETA WD/O. RAMANGOUDA PATIL,
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE,
R/O. INAMDAR GALLI, MARIHAL,
TQ AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1B. DEEPA W/O. SATISH PATIL,
AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. LAILA SUGAR FACTORY, KUPATGIRI,
TQ. KHANAPUR, DIST. BELAGAVI.
1C. DIVYA D/O. RAMANGOUDA PATIL.
YASHAVANT AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
NARAYANKAR R/O. INAMDAR GALLI, MARIHAL,
Digitally signed by TQ AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
YASHAVANT
NARAYANKAR
Date: 2025.10.18
10:51:28 +0530 1D. BASANGOUDA S/O. RAMANGOUDA PATIL,
AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT,
R/O. INAMDAR GALLI, MARIHAL,
TQ AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
2. SHIVANAGOUDA S/O. BASANAGOUDA PATIL,
(SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.,)
2A. MAHADEVI WD/O. SHIVANGOUDA PATIL,
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. PANCHAYAT GALLI, MARIHAL,
TQ AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13998
RSA No. 1133 of 2007
HC-KAR
2B. PREMA @ RAJESHWARI HONAKNAWAR,
AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. KOLVI, KHANAGAON, TQ. GOKAK,
DIST. BELAGAVI.
2C. VAISHALI W/O. HARISH HOSUR,
AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O.C/O. HARISH HOSUR, LIG-209, KHB,
AMARGOL, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI.
3. SANGANGOUDA S/O. BASANAGOUDA PATIL,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/AT. INAMDAR GALLI, MARIHAL,
TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-590016.
4. KASHAVVA W/O. BASANAGOUDA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/AT. INAMDAR GALLI, MARIHAL,
TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-590016.
5. SHANTAVVA W/O. BABU DESAI,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/AT. APMC QTRS, MARIHAL YARD,
TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-590016
6. SHOBHA W/O. SIDRAMAPPA HOSAMANI,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/AT. EXTENSION AREA, NEAR APMC YARD,
BAILHONGAL, TQ. BAILHONGAL,
DIST. BELAGAVI-590016.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SANGRAM S.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. JANGLISAB S/O. MOHD HUSSAIN MULLA,
(SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.,)
1A. MRS. JIBHEDA WD/O. JANGALISAB MULLA,
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13998
RSA No. 1133 of 2007
HC-KAR
AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. H.NO.425-A, MARATHA GALLI,
VILLAGE: MARIHAL, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1B. MR. SHABBIR AHMED S/O. JANGALISAB MULLA,
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. H.NO.425-A, MARATHA GALLI,
VILLAGE: MARIHAL, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1C. MRS. ASMA W/O. RIYAZ MAKANDAR
JANGALISAB MULLA,
AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. KAROSHI, TQ. CHIKKODI,
DIST. BELAGAVI.
1D. MRS. NOORJAHAN MAKANDAR
AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. H.NO.425-A, MARATHA GALLI,
VILLAGE: MARIHAL, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1E. MRS. MUMTAZ W/O. ALLABAKSHN SHAIKHJI
AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. H.NO.439-A, BHAGBAN GALLI,
VILLAGE: MARIHAL, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1F. MRS. DINAR W/O. DADAPEER ZARE,
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. H.NO.222, MARATHA GALLI,
VILLAGE: MARIHAL, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1G. MR. MOHAMMED RAFIQ
S/O. JANGALISAB MULLA,
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. H.NO.424, MARATHA GALLI,
VILLAGE: MARIHAL, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1H. MR. SHAHAJAAN S/O. JANGALISAB MULLA,
AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. H.NO.425, MARATHA GALLI,
VILLAGE: MARIHAL, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1I. MR. MALIKJAAN S/O. JANGALISAB MULLA,
AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. H.NO.425, MARATHA GALLI,
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13998
RSA No. 1133 of 2007
HC-KAR
VILLAGE: MARIHAL, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1J. MRS. ARIFA W/O. SAKDRODDIN GOVE,
AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. H.NO.29, HOSPET GALLI,
HIREBAGEWADI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1K. MRS. SHAMSHAD W/O. CHANDSAB MULLA
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. H.NO.43, PATIL GALLI,
GOVT. HOSPITAL, YAMKANMARDI,
TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1L. MR. SHAMASHODDIN S/O. JANGALISAB MULLA,
AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. H.NO.424, MARATHA GALLI,
VILLAGE: MARIHAL, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
1M. MR. HAMID S/O. JANGALISAB MULLA,
AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. H.NO.425, MARATHA GALLI,
VILLAGE: MARIHAL, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SRINAND A.PACHHAPURE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 (A TO M))
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED: 18.12.2006 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.214/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE
(SR.DN.), BELAGAVI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE
THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED: 30.9.2002 PASSED IN
OS.NO. 709/1999 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.),
BELAGAVI.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13998
RSA No. 1133 of 2007
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) Learned counsel appearing for the appellants and respondent are present.
2. The appellants and respondents are also present.
3. The petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC is filed recording the settlement between the parties. Respondent No.10, who is the power of attorney holder of all other respondents is present before the Court. Among the appellants, except the appellant Nos.1(B), 1(C) and 2(B), all other appellants are present.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that except appellant No.2(B), all other appellants have signed the compromise petition. He also submits that the appellant No.2(B) would file an affidavit, confirming the settlement reached as per the compromise petition within a week.
-6-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13998 RSA No. 1133 of 2007 HC-KAR
5. The appellants and respondent No.1(I) submit and acknowledged the contents of the compromise petition. By virtue of the compromise petition, 5 guntas of the suit schedule property is retained by the land owners of the property and the remaining portion of 15 guntas is agreed to be sold to the respondents.
6. The above settlement between the parties is just, proper and reasonable. Therefore, the settlement as per the compromise petition filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC is accepted. Hence, the following:
ORDER
i) The appeal is allowed.
ii) The impugned judgment and decree is set aside.
iii) The appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC.
iv) The decree be drawn after applicant No.2B files her affidavit confirming the contents of the compromise petition.
-7-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13998 RSA No. 1133 of 2007 HC-KAR
v) If for any reason applicant No.2(B) do not file the affidavit as confirming the compromise petition, this order stands recalled and the appeal will be restored to its file.
SD/-
(C M JOSHI) JUDGE SSP CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 51