Karnataka High Court
Smt. Bindu Rishi Bafna vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 14 October, 2025
Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar
Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:40854
WP No. 24189 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 24189 OF 2025 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
SMT. BINDU RISHI BAFNA,
W/O RISHI R. JAIN,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
NO 5, FLAT 301, 3RD FLOOR,
KALPAVRIKSH HOMES,
1ST MAIN, CHAKRAVARTHY IYENGAR STREET,
SHESHADRIPURAM,
BENGALURU - 560 020
EMAIL: [email protected]
MOBILE: 9448629663
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GEETHA RANI K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
Digitally signed CIRCLE-(2)(2)1,
by CHANDANA BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD,
BM KORAMANGALA,
Location: High BANGALORE - 560 095
Court of
Karnataka 2. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX RANGE -2(2),
BMTC BUILDING,80 FEET ROAD,
KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AS FAR AS THE
PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR
ORDER IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR OTHERWISE THE
IMPUGNED ORDER UNDER SECTION 148A(3) OF THE ACT VIDE
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:40854
WP No. 24189 of 2025
HC-KAR
ITBA/AST/F/148A/2025-26/1077758660(1) DATED 25.06.2025 PASSED
BY THE LEARNED FIRST RESPONDENT FOR AY 2021-22,
ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:
A. Quash as far as the Petitioner is concerned by an appropriate writ or order in the nature of Certiorari or otherwise the impugned Order under section 148A(3) of the Act vide ITBA/AST/F/148A/2025- 26/1077758660(1) dated 25.06.2025 passed by the Learned First Respondent for AY 2021-22, enclosed as Annexure A. B. Quash as far as the Petitioner is concerned by an appropriate writ or order in the nature of Certiorari or otherwise the impugned Notice under section 148 of the Act vide ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2025- 26/1077760164(1) dated 25.06.2025 issued by the Learned First Respondent for AY 2021-22, enclosed as Annexure B. And C. Grant such other reliefs as this Honourable High Court may think fit including the cost of this writ petition."-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:40854 WP No. 24189 of 2025 HC-KAR
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the order of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters - dated 28.08.2025, in order to contend that the present petition deserves to be allowed and disposed of in terms of the said order.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed.
5. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner the present petition is directly and squarely covered by the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters - dated 28.08.2025, the operative portion of which reads as under:
"13. I, therefore, pass the following:-4-
NC: 2025:KHC:40854 WP No. 24189 of 2025 HC-KAR ORDER
(i) The impugned show cause notices issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer outside the scope of Section 151-A of the Act stand obliterated. All further proceedings initiated thereto, challenged in these cases would stand quashed.
(ii) Liberty is reserved to the respondents - revenue to revive all these petitions in the event the Apex Court would hold in favour of the Revenue in the pending before it.
(iii) With the aforesaid liberty and to the aforesaid extent, the petitions are allowed.
(iv) Contentions of both the parties except the one noted hereinabove, shall remain open to be considered in the event revival of these petitions would become necessary."
6. The aforesaid order is applicable to the facts and circumstances of the instant case and consequently, the present petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment of co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Ramachandra Reddy's case (supra).
7. In the result, I pass the following:
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC:40854 WP No. 24189 of 2025 HC-KAR ORDER
(i) The petition is allowed and disposed of in terms of the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax -
W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters - dated 28.08.2025.
(ii) The impugned order and notice at Annexures-A and B dated 25.06.2025 and 25.06.2025 respectively, are hereby quashed.
(iii) Liberty is reserved in favour of the respondents -
Revenue to seek revival of this petition, subsequent to disposal of the matters pending before the Apex Court and all rival contentions between the parties in this regard are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same.
Sd/-
(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC: List No.: 2 Sl No.: 94