Karnataka High Court
Sri V N Chethan vs Sri Dayanand Bhandari on 6 November, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:45211-DB
CCC No. 348 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.348 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI V N CHETHAN
S/O M VENKATESH
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/A NO.180
"CHOWDESHWARI NILAYA"
NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE
GOVINDASHETTYPALYA
ELECTRONIC CITY POST
BEGUR HOBLI
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK
BENGALURU-560100.
...COMPLAINANT
Digitally signed (BY SRI. C V MANJUNATHA, ADVOCATE)
by
CHANNEGOWDA
PREMA AND:
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka 1. SRI DAYANAND BHANDARI
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KIADB, KANIJA BHAVANA
5TH FLOOR, EAST WING
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU-560001.
2. SRI S M SHIVAKUAMR
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUSITION OFFICER-II
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:45211-DB
CCC No. 348 of 2024
HC-KAR
KIADB, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
OPP. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
BENGALURU-560009.
3. SRI A E SANJAY
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-II
CUM DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
KIADB, NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR
MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVANA
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560001.
...ACCUSED
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
BENGALURU-560 001.
...PROFORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PATIL BHEEMANGOUDA BASANAGOUDA, ADV. FOR A1
TO A3;
SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR PROFORMA R4)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF
THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE
ACCUSED FOR SHOWING WILLFUL DISRESPECT TO THE
ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 17.03.2023 PASSED
IN W.P.NO.5794/2023 (LA-KIADB).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:45211-DB
CCC No. 348 of 2024
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 17.03.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.5794/2023.
2. The respondents have filed a compliance affidavit along with the order dated 29.10.2025.
3. We have perused the affidavit and the order dated 29.10.2025.
4. In view of the aforesaid affidavit and the order, the contempt proceedings are dropped, reserving liberty to the complainant to challenge the said order, if so advised.
Sd/-
(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/-
(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE PN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 32