Karnataka High Court
Smt Renukamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 November, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:46276-DB
WA No. 1246 of 2023
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1246 OF 2023 (SCST)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT RENUKAMMA
W/O LATE MADAHANUMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
2. SRI. M ANJUNATH
S/O LATE MADAHANUMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
3. SMT. MAMATHA
D/O LATE MADAHANUMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by ALL ARE RESIDING AT
NIRMALA NO. 16, KANTEERAVA COLONY,
DEVI
Location:
13TH E CROSS,
HIGH COURT AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI,
OF
KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560079.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. KARTHIK C, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU DISTRICT,
VISVESWARAIAH TOWERS,
DR. AMBEKDAR VEEDHI,
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:46276-DB
WA No. 1246 of 2023
HC-KAR
BENGALURU-560001.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION,
D.C.OFFICE COMPOUND,
K.R. ROAD, BENGALURU-560001.
3. SMT. GANGAMMA
W/O GOVINDAPPA,
AGED MAJOR,
C/O SRINIVAS MURTHY FARM
GAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE
DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK,
BENGALURU-562123.
4. SMT. SHYLAJA
W/O MARIYAPPA,
AGED MAJOR,
R/AT NO. 340, 57TH CROSS,
3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU-560010.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT NAMITHA MAHESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2
SRI. P.B. AJIT, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE OF THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE PASSED IN WP No. 7707/2021 (SC/ST) DATED
12.07.2023 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:46276-DB
WA No. 1246 of 2023
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. None appears for the appellants.
2. It is noted that none appeared on behalf of the appellant on the previous date of hearing [05.06.2025] as well.
2. However, this Court had directed the appellants to take steps for service of notice on respondent No.3. Respondent No.3 also remained unserved for want of necessary steps.
3. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE BS - List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16