Karnataka High Court
Arunkumar D Kularni vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors on 7 January, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-K:40
WP No. 200516 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO.200516 OF 2023 (S-R)
BETWEEN:
ARUNKUMAR D KULKARNI
S/O DAMODHARA RAO KULKARNI,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
OCC: RETIRED ENGLISH LECTURER,
NUTAN VIDYALAYA PRE-UNIVERSITY COLLEGE,
KALABURAGI-585 105
R/O "SAPTAKOTI" PLOT NO.89,
OZA LAYOUT, RAM MANDIR CIRCLE,
KALABURAGI-585102.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by RENUKA AND:
Location: High
Court Of
Karnataka 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
(PRE-UNIVERSITY), M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE DIRECTOR,
PRE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION,
18TH CROSS, SAMPIGE ROAD,
MALLESHWARAM,
BANGALORE-560 012.
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-K:40
WP No. 200516 of 2023
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR,
PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION,
KALABURAGI DISTRICT,
KALABURAGI-585 101.
4. THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E),
KARNATAKA, PARK HOUSE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. ANITA M. REDDY, HCGP FOR R1 AND R3;
R2 AND R4 SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS
TO CONSIDER HIS REPRESENTATION DATED 21.11.2022 AT
ANNEXURE- J AND TO RECKON AND COUNT THE SERVICES
FROM HIS INITIAL DATE OF APPOINTMENT UP TO DATE OF
APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT I.E., FROM 06.08.1990 TO
15.06.1993 AND TO GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS
RETROSPECTIVELY AND ALSO TO REVISE HIS PENSION AND
PENSIONERY BENEFITS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-K:40
WP No. 200516 of 2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner has sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus to consider his representation dated 21.11.2022 and count his past service from 06.08.1990 to 15.06.1993 for the purpose of pensionary benefits.
2. The petitioner contends that he was appointed as an English lecturer on 06.08.1990. His appointment was approved on 28.08.1991. Later, his appointment was admitted to salary grant on 15.06.1993. Respondent No.3 granted the benefit of the pay scale as prevalent in respondent No.2. The petitioner contends that in the order granting the pay scale dated 06.07.1993, it was mentioned that the petitioner is entitled to count his past service for the purpose of leave and pensionary benefits. The petitioner contends that he retired from service on 31.10.2020. His pensionary benefits were settled by treating his service from 15.06.1993. The petitioner and others approached this Court in Writ Petition Nos.200927- -4- NC: 2025:KHC-K:40 WP No. 200516 of 2023 201013/2014 for a direction to the respondents to count the past service rendered by them for the purpose of fixation of pay scale, seniority, increments, pension etc. The said writ petitions were disposed off in terms of the order dated 23.01.2014 on the same lines as in Writ Petition No.19431/2005 and connected writ petitions which was affirmed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.848/2008 and connect writ appeals and by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) Nos.22176- 22186/2010. The petitioner contends that respondent Nos.1 and 2 have now promulgated the Karnataka Private Aided Educational Institutions Employees (Regulation of Pay, Pension and other Benefits), Act, 2014, in terms of which, the past service is not counted for the purpose of determining the pensionary benefits. The petitioner therefore submitted representation dated 21.11.2022 requesting the respondents to consider the past service i.e., from 06.08.1990 for the purpose of determining the pensionary benefits payable and accordingly revise the pension fixed. The petitioner submits that the order -5- NC: 2025:KHC-K:40 WP No. 200516 of 2023 passed in Writ Petition Nos.200927-201013/2014 is challenged in Writ Appeal No.2476/2015 and the same is pending consideration. He submits that a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.23263/2021 had permitted the petitioner to make appropriate representation to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to count the unaided period for service benefits as well as for pensionary benefits after disposal of Writ Appeal No.2476/2015 and connected appeals. He therefore contends that the petitioner also be extended the same benefit and the petitioner be permitted to file an appropriate representation after disposal of Writ Appeal No.2476/2015.
3. Learned High Court Government Pleader on the other hand contended that the petitioner's appointment was admitted to salary grant with effect from 15.06.1993 and therefore the petitioner cannot compel the respondents to count past service when his appointment was not admitted to salary grant. He submits that the -6- NC: 2025:KHC-K:40 WP No. 200516 of 2023 liability to pay pension is only from the date the appointment of the petitioner was admitted to salary grant. Thus, she contends that the petitioner is not entitled for any relief in this writ petition.
4. Since a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court following the judgment in Writ Petition No.19431/2005 has disposed off Writ Petition Nos.200927-201013/2014 filed by the petitioner and others, which is presently challenged by the State Government in Writ Appeal No.2476/2015, the only relief that can be extended to the petitioner is to permit the petitioner to file appropriate representation requesting respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider counting the unaided period for service benefits as well as pensionary benefits after disposal of the Writ Appeal No.2476/2015 and connected appeals. Consequently, the following order is passed:
ORDER
i) The Writ Petition is allowed in part. -7-
NC: 2025:KHC-K:40 WP No. 200516 of 2023
ii) The petitioner is permitted to submit a representation to respondent Nos.1 and 2 requesting them to count the unaided period of service for determination of the terminal benefits as well as the pensionary benefits. This shall be only after disposal of Writ Appeal No.2476/2015 and connected appeals.
iii) If a representation is made, respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall consider the same in accordance with law and in the light of the judgment that may be passed in Writ Appeal No.2476/2015.
Sd/-
(R.NATARAJ) JUDGE RSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44 Ct:si