Wilson Garden Residents Welfare ... vs Mr. Tushar Giri Nath., Ias

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26934 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Wilson Garden Residents Welfare ... vs Mr. Tushar Giri Nath., Ias on 11 November, 2024

                                              -1-
                                                         NC: 2024:KHC:45400-DB
                                                            CCC No. 91 of 2024




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                           PRESENT
                          THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                              AND
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
                                   CCC NO. 91 OF 2024 (CIVIL)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   WILSON GARDEN RESIDENTS
                        WELFARE ASOCIATION R
                        87, 8TH CROSS, WILSON GARDEN
                        BANGALORE - 560 027.
                        REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT:
                        MR. D.T. KUMAR
                        S/O. LATE A. T. DORAI,
                        AGED 67 YEARS,
                        R/AT NO.87, 8TH CROSS,
                        WILSON GARDEN, BENGALURU - 560 027.
                                                                ...COMPLAINANT
                   (BY SRI PRASANNA V. R., ADVOCATE)
                   AND:
Digitally signed
by VALLI
MARIMUTHU          1.   MR. TUSHAR GIRI NATH, IAS.,
Location: High          THE COMMISSIONER,
Court of                BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
Karnataka
                        HUDSON CIRCLE,
                        BENGALURU - 560 002.

                   2.   DR. JAGADISH NAIK,
                        THE JOINT COMMISSIONER
                        SOUTH ZONE, BENGALURU
                        BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
                        HUDSON CIRCLE,
                        BENGALURU - 560 002.

                   3.   DR. KOMALA,
                        THE MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH,
                               -2-
                                          NC: 2024:KHC:45400-DB
                                               CCC No. 91 of 2024




      CHICKPET, SOUTH ZONE,
      BBMP SHOPPING COMPLEX,
      J.C. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002.

4.    MR. KUMARVEL,
      THE HEALTH INSPECTOR,
      HOMBEGOWDANAGAR, WARD NO.145,
      BBMP SHOPPING COMPLEX,
      J.C. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002.

5.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
      HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
      VIDHANA SOUDHA,
      BENGALURU - 560 001.
      REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
                                                     ...ACCUSED
(BY SRI SYED SHARUKH, ADVOCATE FOR
 SRI S.H. PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R1
 SRI M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R5)

       THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF
THE     CONTEMPT      OF   COURTS       ACT,     1971,   BY   THE
COMPLAINANT PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT BE
PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST
THE     ACCUSED      FOR    HAVING      COMMITTED        WILLFUL
DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 24.01.2023 IN WP
NO.9606/2020 (LB-BMP) (PIL) PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE
COURT AS PER ANNEXURE-A, PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

       THIS   PETITION,    COMING    ON    FOR      PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN

AS UNDER:
                                     -3-
                                             NC: 2024:KHC:45400-DB
                                                 CCC No. 91 of 2024




CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
       N. V. ANJARIA
       and
       HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND


                         ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) The present contempt proceedings arise out of the directions issued by this Court in the order dated 24.01.2023 while disposing of the writ petition.

2. It appears that in the writ petition, the petitioner-complainant had raised certain grievance about the inaction on part of the respondent authorities-Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) and its officers in particular, in not taking steps against the commercial activity in the residential areas. The Court recorded that the statement made on behalf of the authorities that the necessary steps may be taken, will be treated as an undertaking given to the Court. In that light, the Court gave liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent-BBMP and to submit a proper representation and on receipt of such representation, the BBMP to take appropriate action.

-4-

NC: 2024:KHC:45400-DB CCC No. 91 of 2024

3. It could be noticed from the order that while issuing direction, no time limit has been prescribed by this Court in taking action. In absence of the time limit, it is difficult to conclude that any of the respondents have committed contempt of the Court much less willful contempt in taking action.

3.1 At the same time, since the orders of the Court should not go uncomplied with.

4. The Court put a query to learned advocate Mr. V.R. Prasanna for the complainant as to which kind of commercial activities the petitioner was focusing for the purpose of taking action by the authorities.

4.1 In response to the above, learned advocate for the complainant drew attention of the Court to the communication dated 27.10.2023 addressed to the Chief Commissioner, BBMP, in which it is stated that the flower vendors who were carrying on commercial activities and their business in the residential area should be evicted.

5. Since there is a direction of the Court as above, it is provided that if the flower vendors in the residential area are doing business -5- NC: 2024:KHC:45400-DB CCC No. 91 of 2024 by encroaching or doing some illegal activity, then the authorities shall take necessary actions within two months, if required.

6. It goes without saying that the BBMP is enjoined in law to take action against all illegal encroachments.

7. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition is not entertained. Accordingly, it is disposed of.

Sd/-

(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2