Valu Rathod vs The Divisional Controller

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14863 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Valu Rathod vs The Divisional Controller on 27 June, 2024

                                                 -1-
                                                   NC: 2024:KHC-K:4372-DB
                                                           WA No.200058 of 2024




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                                        KALABURAGI BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
                                              PRESENT
                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
                                                AND
                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

                             WRIT APPEAL NO.200058 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC)

                      BETWEEN:

                      VALU RATHOD S/O DHANSINGH
                      AGED 48 YEARS,
                      OCC: EX-CONDUCTOR NO.3346
                      N.E.K.R.T.C. KALABURGI DIVISION-2,
                      R/O : HARVAL, TQ: JEWARGI,
                      DIST: KALABURAGI -585 310.
                                                                    ...APPELLANT
                      (BY SRI K.RAVINDRA AND
                      SRI REVANARADHYA C.HIREMATH, ADVOCATES)

                      AND:

Digitally signed by
                      THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
BASALINGAPPA
SHIVARAJ
                      N.E.K.R.T.C. KALABURAGI DIVISION NO.2,
DHUTTARGAON           KALABURAGI.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF              REPRESENTED BY THE
KARNATAKA
                      CHIEF LAW OFFICER N.E.K.R.T.C.
                      CENTRAL OFFICE, KALABURAGI -585 102.
                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                           THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
                      KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE
                      APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINAL ORDER OF THE SINGLE
                      JUDGE DATED 01.02.2024 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION
                      NO.205862/2019 AND ORDER FOR THE REINSTATEMENT OF
                      THE APPELLANT IN TO THE SERVICES IN THE INTEREST OF
                      JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
                                 -2-
                                  NC: 2024:KHC-K:4372-DB
                                          WA No.200058 of 2024




    THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ASHOK S. KINAGI J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                            JUDGMENT

This writ appeal is filed challenging the order dated 01.02.2024 passed in W.P.No.205862/2019 by the learned Single Judge. The writ petition filed by the petitioner is held to be under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, and Co-ordinate bench of this Court in the case of Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd., Bangalore Vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Karmika Sangha Bangalore, reported in AIR Online 2022 KAR 4396, held that the intra Court appeal is not maintainable against the order passed by the learned Single Judge being a challenge to the judicial order of the Labour Court. The co-ordinate Bench of this Court referring the order passed in Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd. (supra) in W.A.No.100230/2023, disposed of on 12.04.2023, held that the intra Court appeal is not maintainable. The appellant, in the said writ appeal aggrieved by the order dated 12.04.2023, preferred Special Leave Petition before -3- NC: 2024:KHC-K:4372-DB WA No.200058 of 2024 the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP (Civil) Diary Nos.32290/2023. The Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 15.03.2024 dismissed the Special Leave Petition and observed as under:

"We see no infirmity with the view taken by the Division Bench of the High Court in the impugned orders. The special leave petitions are accordingly dismissed."

2. In view of the law laid down in the case of Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd. Bangalore, the intra Court appeal filed by the appellant is not maintainable. Accordingly, writ appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE NB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19 CT:VK