Karnataka High Court
Smt Tasalmi W/O Salim Sayyed vs Smt Dhanalaxmi M Shrinivas on 3 June, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:7328
MFA No. 102262 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102262 OF 2022 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. TASALMI W/O. SALIM SAYYED,
AGE: 22 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. KANAGALA-591225M
TALUKA: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI.
2. SMT. ARAMAN W/O. BABU SAYYED,
AGE: 53 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. KANAGALA-591225,
TALUKA: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SMT. SUNANDA P. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. DHANALAXMI M. SHRINIVAS,
AGE: 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS,
R/O. 402, LAVAKUSH NAGAR, L.G. RAMANNA
LAYOUT, LAGGERE, BENGALURU-560058.
Digitally
signed by 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER,
MANJANNA E
Location: UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,
HIGH COURT MARUTI GALLI, BELAGAVI-590001,
OF
KARNATAKA DISTRICT: BELAGAVI.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. N. R. KUPPELUR, ADV. FOR R2;
NOTICE TO R1 HELD SUFFICIENT)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1)OF MOTOR
VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
19.08.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.665/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL,
HUKKERI, ITINERARY COURT AT SANKESHWAR, PARTLY ALLOWING
THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:7328
MFA No. 102262 of 2022
JUDGMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for respondent No.2 - Insurance Company.
2. The appellants have filed this appeal for enhancement of compensation, aggrieved by the judgment and award passed by the Trial Court in M.V.C. No.665/2019.
3. After hearing some time, learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal. The contents of the memo is as under:
"The appellants do not want to proceed with this appeal and wants to withdraw this appeal. Hence, the same is disposed of as withdrawn."
4. In view of the memo and supporting submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, no liberty is granted.
Sd/-
JUDGE RSH / ct-an List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0