Gulashan vs M/S Chetak Logistics Ltd And Anr

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19121 Kant
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Gulashan vs M/S Chetak Logistics Ltd And Anr on 31 July, 2024

Author: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

                                             -1-
                                                        NC: 2024:KHC-K:5499
                                                    MFA No. 203716 of 2023




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                           DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                           BEFORE

                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

                        MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.203716 OF 2023 (MV-D)


                   BETWEEN:

                   SMT. GULASHAN
                   W/O MAHIBOOB PHULMAMADI @ SAYYED
                   AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD
                   R/O. VADAKABAL,
                   BASAVA NAGAR, SOLAPUR
                   NOW AT SIDDESHWAR NAGAR
                   TIKOTA ROAD, VIJAYAPURA.


                                                               ...APPELLANT

                   (BY SRI SANGANAGOUDA V. BIRADAR, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by RENUKA          AND:
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA          1.   M/S CHETAK LOGISTICS LTD.,
                        PLOT NO.8 SECTOR-6,
                        MAIN MATHURA ROAD,
                        FARIDABAD-121001
                        (HARYANA)
                        (OWNER OF LORRY NO.HR-38/U-9077).

                   2.   THE BRANCH MANAGER
                        THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE
                        COMPANY LIMITED
                        HANAMSHETTI BUILDING,
                        GURUKUL ROAD,
                                -2-
                                             NC: 2024:KHC-K:5499
                                       MFA No. 203716 of 2023




   VIJYAPURA-586101.


                                                ...RESPONDENTS

(NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH;
 SMT. PREETI PATIL MELKUNDI ADV. FOR R2)


     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO
EXERCISE ITS APPELLATE          JURISDICTION CALL FOR THE
ENTIRE LOWER COURT       AND MODIFY THE        JUDGEMENT AND
AWARD DATED 21.08.2023 PASSED BY THE MOTOR ACCIDENT
CLAIMS   TRIBUNAL     NO.VI,   AT    VIJAYAPURA     IN   MVC   NO.
578/2019 BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT AS
PRAYED   FOR.   AND    DIRECT    THE        RESPONDENT     NO.   2
INSURANCE COMPANY TO DEPOSIT THE ENHANCED AWARD
AMOUNT    AND    TO     RECOVER       THE    SAME    FROM      THE
RESPONDENT NO. 1 AS PER THE ORDER OF HONOURABLE
SUPREME COURT IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 20962/2017 (ARISING
OUT OF SLP (C) NO.29032/2015), PAPPU AND OTHERS V/S
VINOD KUMAR LAMBA AND ANOTHER AND ETC.


     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
                                      -3-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC-K:5499
                                              MFA No. 203716 of 2023




                           ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA)

1. In respect of the death of Anwarali, a 20 year old boy, the Tribunal has awarded the following sums as compensation:

Compensation Sl. As awarded by No. Nature of Heads the Tribunal (In Rs.) Loss of dependency
1. Rs.10250/- / 2 = Rs.5,125/- 15,49,800/-

Rs.5,125/- + 2,050/- (40%) = Rs.7175/- (Rs.7,175/- x "18" x 12)

2. Funeral expenses 16,500/-

3. Filial Consortium 40,000/-

Total 16,06,300/-

2. The Tribunal has, however, exonerated the insurance company of its liability on the ground that the driver of the vehicle did not possess a valid and effective driving licence. Since the Tribunal has recorded a finding that there was a breach of the policy condition, in light of the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in New India Assurance Company Limited vs. Yallavva and -4- NC: 2024:KHC-K:5499 MFA No. 203716 of 2023 another, reported in ILR 2020 KAR 2239, the insurance company would be liable to pay the compensation and thereafter, proceed to recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle.

3. Thus, the finding of the Tribunal insofar as it relates to exonerating the insurance company from its liability is modified and it is held that the insurance company shall satisfy the compensation payable to the claimant and thereafter proceed to recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle.

4. As far as the compensation is concerned, the income of the deceased is correctly determined by the Tribunal and appropriate deduction and multiplier had also been applied and hence, the amount awarded towards loss of dependency will have to be maintained.

5. However, in light of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi &. Others reported in (2017) 16 SCC -5- NC: 2024:KHC-K:5499 MFA No. 203716 of 2023 680, the claimant shall be entitled to a sum of Rs.33,000/- under the conventional heads and a sum of Rs.44,000/- towards loss of love and affection.

6. In the result, the claimant would be entitled to the following sums:

Compensation Sl. As awarded by No. Nature of Heads this Court (In Rs.)
1. Loss of Dependency 15,49,800/-
2. Loss of love and affection 44,000/-
3. Conventional heads 33,000/-
                                             Total :        16,26,800/-



7.     Thus,      the        claimant        would     be        entitled    for

compensation            of      Rs.16,26,800/-               as         against

Rs.16,06,300/- awarded by the Tribunal, along with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from the date of petition till its realization.
8. The disbursement of the compensation amount shall be made as per the award of the Tribunal. -6-

NC: 2024:KHC-K:5499 MFA No. 203716 of 2023

9. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the amount of compensation awarded along with interest within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, and thereafter, proceed against the owner of the offending vehicle to recover the same.

10. The appeal is accordingly allowed in part.

11. In view of the disposal of the appeal, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Sd/-

(N.S.SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32 CT: VD