Karnataka High Court
Sri L Prakash vs Sri P Krishna Reddy on 30 July, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:30044
CRL.A No. 1292 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1292 OF 2012 (A)
BETWEEN:
SRI. L. PRAKASH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH REDDY
R/AT NO.111/1, MUNIKOLALA
NEAR DENTAL COLLEGE
MARATHAHALLI POST
BANGALORE - 560 037.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. DIWAKAR., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed
by NANDINI B SRI. P KRISHNA REDDY
G S/O SRI. PILLA REDDY
Location: high R/AT NO.97/3-2
court of
karnataka 1ST FLOOR 13TH CROSS
8TH MAIN, WILSON GARDEN
BANGALORE - 560 030.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.VASANTH MADHAV, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4)
CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED
10.09.2012 PASSED BY THE XIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN
C.C.NO.7055/2009 ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED
FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF
N.I.ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING,
THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:30044
CRL.A No. 1292 of 2012
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation.
2. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation. Court notice was ordered to be issued to the appellant. Office note discloses that notice is served on the appellant. Learned counsel has also not filed the vakalath.
3. The appeal is of the year 2012. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
(M G UMA) JUDGE *bgn/-
CT:VS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25