Karnataka High Court
Sri S Manju vs Smt Uma on 26 July, 2024
Author: V Srishananda
Bench: V Srishananda
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:29902
CRL.RP No. 81 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 81 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI. S. MANJU,
S/O SRINIVAS,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT 9/18, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN,
KRISHNAMURTHY LAYOUT,
D.R.C. POST, BALAJI NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 029.
ALSO AT
SRI. S. MANJU
S/O SRINIVAS,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT 10/4, NANJUDESHWARA NILAYA,
2ND MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS,
Digitally VENKATESHWARA LAYOUT,
signed by
MALATESH SUDDAGUNTE PALYA,
KC BANGALORE-560 029.
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF PRESENTLY R/AT
KARNATAKA MR. MANJU. S
S/O SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT NO.7,
3RD MAIN ROAD,
7TH CROSS,
THALAKAVERI STREET,
MARUTHI NAGAR,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:29902
CRL.RP No. 81 of 2022
NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 072.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAGADISH J.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. UMA,
D/O PADMANABH RAO,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/AT NO.28, 3RD CROSS,
3RD MAIN, KRISHNAMURTHY LAYOUT,
D.R.C. POST, BALAJI NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 072.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR L., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.09.2021
PASSED BY THE LXII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
IN CRL.A.NO.1274/2016 AND CONSEQUENTLY SETTING ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.10.2016 PASSED IN
C.C.NO.14316/2012 BY THE HONBLE 19TH A.C.M.M.,
BENGALURU AND DISMISS THE COMPLAINANT FILED BY THE
RESPONDENT ACQUITTING THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:29902
CRL.RP No. 81 of 2022
ORAL ORDER
Joint memo is filed by the parties, signed by their respective Advocates and respondent.
2. In view of the joint memo, revision petition stands disposed of.
3. After payment of entire amount as agreed in the joint memo, sum of Rs.5,000/- ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court towards defraying expenses of the State stands set aside.
4. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant/respondent under due identification.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50