Karnataka High Court
Sri .Sha. Bra, Chandramouleshwara vs Shivalal Ramanath Daga on 26 July, 2024
Author: Ravi V Hosmani
Bench: Ravi V Hosmani
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:29522
MFA No. 5760 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5760 OF 2023 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
SRI .SHA. BRA. CHANDRAMOULESHWARA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
SHIVACHARA SWAMIGALU,
MATHADHIPATHI,
SRI. RAMALINGESHWARA MUTT,
HARANAHALLI,
SHIVAMOGGA TALUK.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. H.R. VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1. SHIVALAL RAMANATH DAGA
Digitally signed by 2. DINESH CHAND
GEETHAKUMARI
PARLATTAYA S S/O. MANGILAL S.JAIN
Location: High
Court of Karnataka
3. SRI. GNANAPRAKASH GOYAL
M/S. GOYAL ESTATE
4. SRI.N.C.VENKATARAMANAPPA
S/O. SRI. VENKATASWAMAPPA
5. SRI.KENCHAPPA
S/O. K.SIDDAPPA
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:29522
MFA No. 5760 of 2023
6. SRI. SRI. SRI. RAMALINGESHWARA SWAMY
SARVAADIKKARIGALU SRI. SRI.SRI.SADGURU
RAMALINGESHWARA MAHASWAMIGALU
7. SRI. GOPALA KRISHNA AADALITHA ADHIKARI,
SRI RAMALINGESHWARA MATH
8. SRI.S.B.SIDDESHWARA SHIVACHARYA
MAHASWAMIGALU
9. SRI.JAGADGURU SRI. NILAKANTA
SARANG DESHIKENDRA MAHASWAMIGALU,
RAMALINGESHWARA MUTT,
PEETADHIPATHIGALU.
10. SRI. SHIVAYOGISHWARA SHIVACHARYHA
MAHASWAMIGALU,
MATHADIPATHI AND SARVADHIKARI,
SRI RAMALINGESHWARA MUTT
11. SRI. S.B. GANGADHARESHWARA
SHIVACHARYHA MAHASWAMIGALU
12. SRI.G.R. GURUMATH
SARVADHIKARI,
SRI RAMALINGESHWARA MUTT
13. SRI. SRI.SRI. MALLIKARJUNA
SHIVACHARYA MAHASWAMIGALU,
MATHADIPATHI AND SARVADHIKARI OF
SRI RAMALINGESHWARA MUTT,
HARANAHALLI, SHIVAMOGA TALUK.
14. SHA. BRA. VISHWARADYA SHIVACHARYA
SWAMIGALU, MATADHIPATHI OF SRI
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:29522
MFA No. 5760 of 2023
RAMALINGESHWARA MUTT, HARANAHALLI,
SHIVAMOGA TALUK & DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION
ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.01.2023
PASSED IN LAC.NO. 48/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU
(CCH NO. 17), PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION
FILED UNDER SECTION 30 AND 31(2) OF THE LAND
ACQUISITION ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
None appears.
There is no compliance with office objection, even cost is not paid. This would indicate that appellant is not diligent in prosecuting petition.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4 Ct: SNN