Karnataka High Court
Bheerappa S/O Masikeppa Masker vs Renukamma D/O Beerappa Masker on 3 July, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:4532
RSA No. 200344 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE Mrs JUSTICE K S HEMALEKHA
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.200344 OF 2015 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. BHEERAPPA S/O MASIKEPPA MASKER
AGED ABOUT: 55 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE AND H.G.M. CO. EMPLOYEE
R/O. KOTA VILLAGE
TQ: LINGASUGUR,
DIST: RAICHUR-584122.
2. BHEEMAPPA @ BHEEMANAGOUDA MASKER
AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O. KOTA VILLAGE
TQ: LINGASUGUR,
DIST: RAICHUR-584 122.
Digitally signed
by SWETA 3. DYAMAWWA W/O MALLAYYA
KULKARNI
AGE: 54 YEARS,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD
KARNATAKA
R/O. KOTA VILLAGE
TQ: LINGASUGUR,
DIST: RAICHUR-584 122.
4. DEVAMMA W/O AMARAPPA
AGE: 52 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. VANDLI-HOSUR VILLAGE,
TQ: LINGASUGURU,
DIST: RAICHUR-584 122.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:4532
RSA No. 200344 of 2015
5. HANUMANTHI W/O ADAPPA
AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD -AGRI.,
R/O. VANDLI-HOSUR VILLAGE,
TQ: LINGASUGURU,
DIST: RAICHUR-584 122.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI B. NOOR ILYAS, ADVOCATE)
AND:
RENUKAMMA D/O BEERAPPA MASKER
AGE: 23 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. KOTA VILLAGE,
TQ: LINGASUGUR,
DIST: RAICHUR-584122.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI GANESH NAIK, ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW
THE APPEAL WITH COSTS, THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
PASSED IN R.A. NO.3/2015 PASSED BY CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.)
LINGASUGUR DATED 14.08.2015 BE SET ASIDE THE FURTHER
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN O.S. NO.69/2008
PASSED BY CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) LINGASUGUR DATED
18.11.2014 BE CONFIRMED.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Appellants' counsel submits that the parties have amicably settled the dispute in the final decree proceedings and do not intend to prosecute the present appeal and files a memo to that effect.
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:4532 RSA No. 200344 of 2015 The memo reads as under:
"In the above matter, the parties to the Appeal, have settled their matter in F.D.P. matter, in view of this, the Appellant does not want to proceed the appeal. Hence same may be dismissed as not press."
In view of the submission and the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE SWK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56 CT: VD