The Divisional Controller vs Y.T.Waddar S/O Timmappa Waddar And Ors

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15349 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

The Divisional Controller vs Y.T.Waddar S/O Timmappa Waddar And Ors on 2 July, 2024

                                                    -1-
                                                      NC: 2024:KHC-K:4484-DB
                                                          WA No. 200533 of 2017




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                        KALABURAGI BENCH

                               DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                              PRESENT

                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
                                                    AND
                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

                             WRIT APPEAL NO. 200533 OF 2017 (L-KSRTC)

                      BETWEEN:

                      THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
                      NEKRTC CENTRAL OFFICE,
                      KALABURAGI,
                      REP. BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER.

                                                                    ...APPELLANT
                      (BY SRI. RATNA N. SHIVAYOGIMATH, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

Digitally signed by
                           Y.T. WADDAR S/O TIMMAPPA WADDAR
BASALINGAPPA
SHIVARAJ
                           SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.
DHUTTARGAON
Location: HIGH
COURT OF              1.   SMT. AKKAMAHADEVI
KARNATAKA
                           W/O LATE Y. T. WADDAR,
                           AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
                           OCC: H H WORK.

                      2.   KUM. KUSMA @ SUDA
                           D/O LATE Y. T. WADDAR,
                           AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS.

                      3.   SHAMALA
                           D/O LATE Y. T. WADDAR
                           AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS.
                              -2-
                               NC: 2024:KHC-K:4484-DB
                                    WA No. 200533 of 2017




4.   PRAVEEN KUMAR
     S/O LATE Y. T. WADDAR
     AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS.

5.   SOUJANYA
     D/O LATE Y. T. WADDAR
     AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS.

     ALL ARE R/O HALAKERI
     TQ. AND DISTRICT: GADAG- 582 101.

                                           ...RESPONDENTS

(NOTICE TO R1 TO R4 ARE SERVED,
 WRIT APPEAL DISMISSED AGAINST R5)


     THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
30.08.2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN
W.P.NO.202087/2017 (L-KSRTC), BY ALLOWING THE WRIT
PETITION.

      THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY ASHOK S. KINAGI J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                       JUDGMENT

This writ appeal is filed challenging the order dated 30.08.2017 passed in W.P.No.202087/2017 by the learned Single Judge. The writ petition filed by the petitioner is held to be under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, and Co-ordinate bench of this Court in the case of Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd., Bangalore -3- NC: 2024:KHC-K:4484-DB WA No. 200533 of 2017 Vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Karmika Sangha Bangalore, reported in AIR Online 2022 KAR 4396, held that the intra Court appeal is not maintainable against the order passed by the learned Single Judge being a challenge to the judicial order of the Labour Court. The co-ordinate Bench of this Court referring the order passed in Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd. (supra) in W.A.No.100230/2023, disposed of on 12.04.2023, held that the intra Court appeal is not maintainable. The appellant, in the said writ appeal aggrieved by the order dated 12.04.2023, preferred Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP (Civil) Diary Nos.32290/2023. The Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 15.03.2024 dismissed the Special Leave Petition and observed as under:

"We see no infirmity with the view taken by the Division Bench of the High Court in the impugned orders. The special leave petitions are accordingly dismissed."
-4-

NC: 2024:KHC-K:4484-DB WA No. 200533 of 2017

2. In view of the law laid down in the case of Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd. Bangalore, the intra Court appeal filed by the appellant is not maintainable. Accordingly, writ appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.

3. In view of the disposal of appeal, IA.Nos.2/2017 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, same stand disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE MSR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1 CT;BN