Karnataka High Court
Smt. Vijayalaxmi W/O Narayanappa ... vs Nwkrtc, R/By Its Managing Director on 2 July, 2024
Author: S G Pandit
Bench: S G Pandit
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB
MFA No. 103922 of 2016
C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.103922 OF 2016 (MV-D)
C/W
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.103104 OF 2017
IN MFA NO.103922 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
1. NWKRTC,
REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NWKRTC, HUBBALLI,
2. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
NWKRTC HAVERI NEAR RTO OFFICE HAVERI,
TAL. AND DIST: HAVERI,
IN APPEAL REP: BY CHIEF LAW OFFICER,
NWKRTC CENTRAL OFFICE, HUBBALLI.
...APPELLANTS
Digitally signed
by VINAYAKA B V (BY SRI M.K. SOUDAGAR, ADVOCATE)
Location: HIGH
COURT OF AND:
KARNATAKA
1. SMT. VIJAYLAXMI W/O. NARAYANAPPA DIVATE,
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: MRUTYNJAYA NAGAR, 2ND CROSS,
TAL: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581115.
2. SHRUTI D/O. NARAYANAPPA DIVATE,
AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
R/O: TAL: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581115.
3. SAGAR S/O. NARAYANAPPA DIVATE,
AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O: TAL: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581115.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB
MFA No. 103922 of 2016
C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017
4. SINDHU D/O. NARAYANAPPA DIVATE,
AGE: 16 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O: RANEBENNUR, TAL: RANEBENNUR,
DIST: HAVERI-581115.
REPRESENTED NO. 4 BEING MINOR
REPRESENTED BY HER MINOR GUARDIAN
MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.1.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SAGAR HEDGE, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI S.R. HEDGE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3;
R4 MINOR REPTD. BY R1)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173 (1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT & AWARD DATED 27.08.2016, PASSED IN
MVC.NO.368/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND MEMBER ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
TRIBUNAL, HAVERI, AWARDING THE COMPENSATION OF
RS.31.22,281/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A. FROM THE
DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF DEPOSITING OF
COMPENSATION AMOUNT.
IN MFA NO.103104 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. VIJAYLAXMI W/O. NARAYANAPPA DIVATE,
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: MRUTYUNJAYA NAGAR, 2ND CROSS,
TAL: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581115.
2. SHRUTI D/O. NARAYANAPPA DIVATE,
AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
R/O: MRUTYUNJAYA NAGAR, 2ND CROSS,
TAL. RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581115.
3. SAGAR S/O. NARAYANAPPA DIVATE,
AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O: MRUTYUNJAYA NAGAR, 2ND CROSS,
TAL: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581115.
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB
MFA No. 103922 of 2016
C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017
4. SINDHU D/O. NARAYANAPPA DIVATE,
AGE: 16 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O: MRUTYUNJAYA NAGAR, 2ND CROSS,
TAL. RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581115.
APPELLANT NO.4 IS MINOR AND R/BY
M/G SMT. VIJAYALAXMI DIVATE.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SAGAR HEDGE, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI S.R. HEDGE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. NWKRTC,
R/BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NWKRTC, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI-580020.
2. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
NWKRTC, HAVERI, NEAR RTO OFFICE, HAVERI,
TAL. AND DIST: HAVERI-581110.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M.K. SOUDAGAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R2)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173 (1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT & AWARD DATED 27.08.2016, PASSED IN
MVC.NO.368/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND MEMBER ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
TRIBUNAL, HAVERI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THESE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEALS, COMING ON FOR
FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, G BASAVARAJA, J., DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
-4-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB
MFA No. 103922 of 2016
C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017
JUDGMENT
The NWKRTC as well as the claimants are in appeals against judgment and award dated 27.08.2016 passed in MVC No.368/2013 on the file of learned Prl. Senior Civil Judge & AMACT., Haveri (for short, 'Tribunal').
2. MFA No.103922/2016 is filed by NWKRTC (for short, 'Corporation') challenging the liability as well as the quantum of compensation; whereas MFA No.103104/2017 is filed by the claimants praying for enhancement of compensation, not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation granted by the Tribunal.
3. The parties are referred to as per their ranks before the Tribunal, for the sake of convenience.
4. Brief relevant facts leading to file these appeals are that, the claimants, who are the wife and children of the deceased Narayan S/o. Ningappa Divate, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for the death of Narayan S/o. -5-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017 Ningappa Divate that took place on 09.05.2010 due to accident that occurred on 02.01.2010 involving KSRTC bus bearing registration No.KA-27/F-30. It is contended that after taking treatment at various hospitals, Sri.Narayan S/o.Ningappa Divate succumbed to injuries on 09.05.2010 at SDM Hospital, Dharwad. It is further stated that prior to the accident, deceased was hale and healthy person, working in NWKRTC Depot as Assistant Store Keeper.
5. On issuance of notice, respondents No.1 and 2 appeared before the Tribunal through their counsel and respondent No.2 filed its statement of objections denying the entire claim petition averments. It is contended that even though the accident occurred on 02.01.2010, a false complaint is filed on 08.01.2010 from the deceased and the driver of the bus, Sri.S.J.Prasadimath who was not on duty as on the date of the accident and contends that death is not due to accidental injuries. Hence, the Corporation is not liable to pay any compensation and sought for dismissal of the claim petition. -6-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017
6. Before the Tribunal, claimant No.1-wife of the deceased examined herself as PW1 and got marked 75 documents as Exs.P1 to P75; whereas on respondents' side the driver of the offending bus is examined as RW1 and got marked 8 documents as Exs.R1 and R8. Having heard the arguments of both the parties and based on the material placed on record, the Tribunal allowed the claim petition in part and awarded a total compensation of Rs.31,22,281/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization. Being aggrieved by the same, the Corporation and the claimants are before this Court in these appeals.
7. Heard Sri.Sagar Hegde, learned counsel appearing for the appellants/claimants and learned counsel Sri.M.K.Soudagar for the Corporation and perused the appeal papers along with original records.
8. Sri.M.K.Soudagar, learned counsel appearing for the Corporation would submit that the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal is contrary to law and -7- NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017 material on record. He submits that the Tribunal has totally erred in holding that the deceased sustained the accidental injuries due to rash and negligent driving of the bus involved in the accident only on the basis of postmortem report even though the death was after lapse of 5 months 7 days from the date of the accident. Learned counsel would submit that the Tribunal erred in assessing the income of the deceased at Rs.22,126/- per month as per the pay slip of the deceased for the month of March, 2010 i.e. Ex.P75 though a sum of Rs.1,087/- came to be added towards basic pay, DA and HRA and the same was unpaid. Learned counsel would submit that the Tribunal has totally erred in adding 50% towards future prospects of the deceased. Further it is submitted that prior to death of Sri.Narayan, he had been reimbursed medical bills and after his death, the Corporation deposited a sum of Rs.2,99,340/- in W.C/AF/MISC. No.2/2010-11 in F.O. No.5955540 dated 17.07.2010, but it is not claimed by the claimants due to rival claims. On all these grounds, he prays to allow the appeal filed by the Corporation. -8-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017
9. Per contra, Sri.Sagar Hegde, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the claimants would submit that the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal is contrary to the material placed on record. Learned counsel would further submit that the Tribunal committed error in awarding meager compensation under the heads of medical expenses and funeral expenses. He submits that the deceased was admitted in the hospital due to accidental injuries as an indoor patient for a period of 5 months and has spent more than Rs.7,00,000/- for his medical expenses, whereas the claimants have spent more than Rs.25,000/- for transportation of dead body, funeral expenses and on other heads. Thus, he prays for allowing the appeal filed by the claimants.
10. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the appeal papers along with original records, the following points would arise for consideration:
a) Whether the Tribunal is justified in holding that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent act on the part of the driver of -9- NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017 KSRTC bus bearing Registration No.KA-
27/F-30 causing death of Sri.Narayan S/o.Nagappa Divate?
b) Whether the claimants are entitled for enhanced compensation?
c) Whether the Tribunal is justified in adding 50% towards future prospects of the deceased?
d) What order?
Our answer to the above points are as under:
Point No.(a) - Affirmative
Point No.(b) - Partly affirmative
Point No.(c) - Partly affirmative
Point No.(d) - As per final order for the following
reasons:
11. Point No.(a): - We have carefully examined material placed on record before this Court. The claimant No.1 being the wife of the deceased Narayan S/o.Nagappa Divate has reiterated the averments made in the claim petition and produced the documents at Exs.P1 to P75. The respondents have contended that false chargesheet is
- 10 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017 filed against the driver of KSRTC bus bearing registration No.KA-27/F-30. To substantiate the same, the driver Sri.S.J.Prasadimath is examined as RW1 and he has deposed that he is not responsible for this accident and he is acquitted in CC.No.202/2010 as per the judgment at Ex.R5.
12. As could be seen from the material placed on record by the claimants that on the basis of the complaint filed by the Narayan, Haveri Town Police have registered the case in FIR No.5/2010 for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 279 and 337 of IPC and Section 134(a)(b) read with Section 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the driver of KSRTC bus bearing registration No.KA-27/F-30 and submitted the FIR to the Court. Thereafter, the Police rushed to spot, conducted spot panchanama, seizure panchanama, inquest panchanama in the presence of Panchas, obtained PM Report, MV Report and recorded statement of witnesses. On thorough investigation, IO has submitted the chargesheet against
- 11 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017 the driver of the offending bus for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304A of IPC and under Section 134(a)(b) read with Section 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
13. The accident occurred on 02.01.2010 and while taking treatment, Sri.Narayan Divate died due to accidental injuries on 09.05.2010. The PM Report at Ex.P7 reveals that the cause of death is due to pelvic injuries and its complications and the same is not disputed by the other side.
14. PW1 has clearly deposed in her evidence that after the accident, her husband was shifted to Government Hospital at Haveri, thereafter he was referred to further treatment to KIMS Hospital, Hubballi, thereafter shifted to Bapuji Hospital, Davanagere and from their shifted to Kasturaba Hospital, Manipal and finally he was shifted to SDM Hospital, Dharwad on 30.04.2010 where he succumbed to the injuries during treatment on 09.05.2010. During the course of cross-examination of
- 12 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017 PW1, the Corporation has not denied this aspect. The chargesheet submitted by the concerned Police is also not been questioned by the Corporation. Considering the evidence placed before the Tribunal, the Tribunal has rightly come to the conclusion that the deceased sustained injuries due to rash and negligent act on the part of the driver of KSRTC bus and died due to accidental injuries during treatment.
15. On re-appreciation, re-examination and re-consideration of the entire evidence on record, we do not find any error/legal infirmity in the finding given by the Tribunal. Accordingly, we answer Point No.1 in the affirmative.
16. Point No.(b) :- With regard to quantum of compensation is concerned, the Tribunal has assessed the income of the deceased as per the pay slip-Ex.P75 at Rs.22,126/- per month which is just and proper.
- 13 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017
17. Since there are four 4 dependants, the Tribunal has rightly deducted 1/4th towards personal and living expenses of the deceased. Multiplier of 11 applied by the Tribunal is also just and proper since the deceased was aged 51 years.
18. Point No.(c) :- With regard to future prospects of the deceased is concerned, the Tribunal has added 50% to the assessed income of the deceased which is not in consonance with the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi & Others1. The age of the deceased was 51 years as on the date of the accident as shown in the claim petition itself. Hence, in view of the above said decision, the claimants are entitled to addition of 15% towards future prospects of the deceased. Thus, the claimants would be entitled for modified compensation on the head of loss of dependency as under: 1
2017 (16) SCC 680
- 14 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017 Rs.22,126 (income) x 12 (months) + 15%(future prospects) x 11(multiplier) x 3/4(deduction) = Rs.25,19,045/-
19. Further, in terms of decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Magma General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs. Nanu Ram and Others2 each of the claimants would be entitled to Rs.40,000/- towards loss of consortium, besides Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate and Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses.
20. Insofar as the award of compensation under the head of medical expenses is concerned, the same is unaltered.
21. Thus, the claimants would be entitled for modified compensation on the following heads:
Sl. Particulars Amount
No. (In Rupees)
1. Loss of dependency 25,19,045/-
2. Loss of estate & Funeral expenses 30,000/-
3. Loss of consortium (Rs.40000x4) 1,60,000/-
4. Medical expenses 1,25,140/-
Total Rs.28,34,185/-
2
2018 ACJ 2782
- 15 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB
MFA No. 103922 of 2016
C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017
22. Thus, the claimants would be entitled to total compensation of Rs.28,34,185/- as against Rs.31,22,281/- awarded by the Tribunal.
23. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Corporation would submit that the Corporation has deposited a sum of Rs.2,99,340/- in W.C/AF/MISC.
No.2/2010-11 in F.O. No.5955540 dated 17.07.2010 and requests this Court to pass an order to permit the Corporation to receive the said amount deposited by the Corporation. Other side has not objected in this regard. Thus, the Corporation is permitted to withdraw the said amount from the concerned authority.
24. Hence, we pass the following:
ORDER
a) Both appeals are allowed in part.
b) The impugned judgment & award of
Tribunal is modified holding that the
claimants are entitled to total
compensation of Rs.28,34,185/- as
against Rs.31,22,281/- awarded by the Tribunal.
- 16 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9018-DB MFA No. 103922 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 103104 of 2017
c) The compensation amount shall carry interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of claim petition till realization.
d) The respondent No.2-Corporation shall deposit the compensation amount with accrued interest before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment.
e) Apportionment, deposit & disbursement shall be made as per award of Tribunal.
f) The amount in deposit, if any, be
transmitted to the concerned Tribunal
forthwith along with original records.
g) The Corporation is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.2,99,340/- in W.C/AF/MISC. No.2/2010-11 in F.O. No.5955540 dated 17.07.2010 from the concerned authority.
h) Draw modified award accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE Sd/-
JUDGE RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50