Mahender Singh vs Himachal Road Transport Corporation & ...

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Mahender Singh vs Himachal Road Transport Corporation & ... on 30 August, 2025

Author: Sandeep Sharma

Bench: Sandeep Sharma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1607 of 2025 Date of Decision: 30.08.2025 .

_______________________________________________________ Mahender Singh .......Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Anr. ... Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):

By way of instant Execution Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents to implement/ execute the order/judgment dated 24.03.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No. 8945 of 2023, titled Mahender Singh vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another.

2. Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings, reveals that this Court, while allowing the petition, directed the respondents to regularize the petition from the date of his initial appointment alongwith all consequential benefits. Since, despite there being specific direction to 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

do the needful, as taken note hereinabove, respondents have failed to do so, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant .

proceedings.

3. Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, while accepting notice on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has every reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid judgment/ order must have been complied with, but if not, same would be complied with within a period of one week from today.

4. Consequently, in view of the fair statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of order/judgment dated 24.03.2025 passed by this Court, positively within a period of one week, if not already done, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings.

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 30,2025 (shankar) ::: Downloaded on - 30/08/2025 21:26:58 :::CIS