IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
.
CWP No.7504 of 2023
Decided on: 09.10.2023
Vinod Kumar ....Petitioner.
Versus
Union of India & others .... Respondents.
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Mehar Chand Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor
r General of India.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Balram Sharma, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court by way of CWP No.5820 of 2023, titled as Vinod Kumar vs. Union of India and Ors., which was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a petition before the appropriate Forum. Thereafter, the petitioner approached learned Armed Forces Tribunal and without any formal adjudication by learned Armed Forces Tribunal with regard to maintainability of the proceedings so filed by the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
::: Downloaded on - 10/10/2023 20:34:32 :::CIS 2petitioner simply on the basis of objections raised to the petition so filed before the Registry of learned Armed Forces Tribunal, the .
petitioner has approached this Court.
3. Incidently, one of the objections raised by the Registry of learned Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, was that learned counsel for the applicant was to specify whether the matter was maintainable before it or not.
4.
misconceived
r herebyto
In this view of the matter, present proceedings being are dismissed. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge October 09, 2023 (Rishi) ::: Downloaded on - 10/10/2023 20:34:32 :::CIS