Son Of Sh. Ganglu Ram vs State Of H.P. The Principal

                                    1




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
                            SHIMLA
                  ON THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST, 2021




                                                           .

                                BEFORE
            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR





          EXECUTION PETITION (TRIBUNAL) NO.72 OF 2021
    Between:-


         SH. KIRPU RAM





         SON OF SH. GANGLU RAM,
         RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HATELA,
         POST OFFICE SAHU,
         TEHSIL    CHAMBA,     DISTRICT
         CHAMBA,

         HIMACHAL PRADESH, EX.BELDAR,

         PWD      DIVISION     CHAMBA,
         DISTRICT CHAMBA, H.P.
                                                           ....PETITIONER



         (BY SH.BONIT PRAKASH,
         ADVOCATE VICE
         SH.A.K. GUPTA, ADVOCATE)




         AND





    1.   STATE OF H.P. THE PRINCIPAL





         SECRETARY (PWD)
         WITH     HEADQUARTERS       AT
         HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-2


    2.   THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF,
         HPPWD WITH HEADQUARTERS
         AT NIRMAN BHAWAN, SHIMLA-2


    3.   THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
         HPPWD DIVISION CHAMBA,
         DISTRICT CHAMBA, H.P.

         (BY SH.YUDHVIR SINGH,
         DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL)




                                          ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 22:56:18 :::CIS
                                      2



    4.   THE SENIOR DEPUTY ACCOUNTANT
         GENERAL WITH HEADQUARTERS AT
         SHIMLA, H.P.

                                                       ....RESPONDENTS




                                                            .

         (NONE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4)


                This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court





    passed the following:

                            JUDGMENT

Reply, stated to have filed, is not on record. However, learned Deputy Advocate General submits that reply stands filed, wherein it has been communicated that the directions issued by the erstwhile H.P. State Administrative Tribunal vide order dated 25.04.2018 stand complied with vide Office Order dated 23.07.2018, whereby claim of the petitioner has been considered and rejected.

2. Copy of the reply alongwith copy of the aforesaid Office order stands supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Faced with aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner intends to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate comprehensive petition for redressal of his grievances including assailing Office Order dated 23.07.2018.

4. Considering submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate petition in accordance with ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 22:56:18 :::CIS 3 law for redressal of his grievances including assailing Office Order dated 23.07.2018.

5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

.

(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.

    August 24, 2021
         (Purohit)





                        r          to









                                                ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 22:56:18 :::CIS