IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
.
Cr.MP(M) No. : 1397 of 2019
Date of Decision: 06.08.2021
__________________________________________________________
Sukhdev @ Nanku
....... petitioner
Vs.
State of Himachal Pradesh .....Respondent
___________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Gobind Korla, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
For the respondent: Mr. Hemanshu Misra Additional
Advocate General.
(Through Video Conferencing)
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
After hearing for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he is under instructions to withdraw the petition at this stage with liberty to file the same afresh.
Allowed.
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?
::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 22:50:06 :::CIS2. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, .
also stands disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge 06th August, 2020 (tarun) ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 22:50:06 :::CIS