Jitusinh @Vikramsinh Ravatsinh ... vs State Of Gujarat

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3500 Guj
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Jitusinh @Vikramsinh Ravatsinh ... vs State Of Gujarat on 13 May, 2026

                                                                                                        NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/11555/2026                             ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

                                                                                                         undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 11555 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                 JITUSINH @VIKRAMSINH RAVATSINH BHURSINH DEVDA
                                                      Versus
                                                STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR N R DESAI(6504) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MS. JYOTI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                       Date : 13/05/2026

                                                        ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11824006250836 of 2025 registered with Uchchhal Police Station, Tapi for the offence punishable under Sections 310(2), 140(2), 204, 61 and 126(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 25(1-b) Page 1 of 6 Uploaded by ANIRUDH OJHA(HC02370) on Thu May 14 2026 Downloaded on : Thu May 14 21:32:15 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/11555/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026 undefined

(a) of the Arms Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that, considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation leveled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed, further incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the Investigation Officer in any manner. It is further contended that, the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the charge-sheet papers. Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Banaskantha Page 2 of 6 Uploaded by ANIRUDH OJHA(HC02370) on Thu May 14 2026 Downloaded on : Thu May 14 21:32:15 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/11555/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026 undefined district, hence would be available at the time of trial; ii. The applicant has one antecedent and trial is going on before the Sessions Court at Deesa, Banaskantha; iii. The investigation has been over and charge-sheet has been filed;
iv. As per the prosecution case, the applicant was the driver of the co-accused Nagjibhai Rabari and was driving the Fortuner car when the original complainant was intercepted, subsequent to which the alleged offence was committed;
v. The apprehension of the learned APP, as regards the non- availability of the applicant during the trial can be put to rest by imposing stringent condition; This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering Page 3 of 6 Uploaded by ANIRUDH OJHA(HC02370) on Thu May 14 2026 Downloaded on : Thu May 14 21:32:15 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/11555/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026 undefined the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No. 11824006250836 of 2025 registered with Uchchhal Police Station, Tapi, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; [b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court within a week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Competent Court concerned;

Page 4 of 6 Uploaded by ANIRUDH OJHA(HC02370) on Thu May 14 2026 Downloaded on : Thu May 14 21:32:15 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/11555/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026 undefined [e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O. and to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change his residence without prior intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark his presence on alternate days for one month, and thereafter, once a week before the concerned police station, till the trial is over;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for which, he shall file an affidavit before the concerned court and the police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law.

Page 5 of 6 Uploaded by ANIRUDH OJHA(HC02370) on Thu May 14 2026 Downloaded on : Thu May 14 21:32:15 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/11555/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026 undefined

11. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be influenced by any observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANIRUDH OJHA Page 6 of 6 Uploaded by ANIRUDH OJHA(HC02370) on Thu May 14 2026 Downloaded on : Thu May 14 21:32:15 IST 2026