Thakor Vishnuji Hiraji vs State Of Gujarat

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3147 Guj
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2026

[Cites 12, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Thakor Vishnuji Hiraji vs State Of Gujarat on 5 May, 2026

                                                                                                           NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/8210/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 05/05/2026

                                                                                                           undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                           R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                       CHARGESHEET) NO. 8210 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                                    THAKOR VISHNUJI HIRAJI
                                                            Versus
                                                      STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR NITINBHAI M DESAI(13406) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR.KIRIT R CHAUDHARI(3745) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                              DESAI

                                                          Date : 05/05/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. K. R. Chaudhari appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Soaham Joshi appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.08/2025-2026 registered with Dharoi Range Police Station, Page 1 of 6 Uploaded by MS.KAJAL KISHORBHAI NAVLAKHA (HCD0076) on Wed May 06 2026 Downloaded on : Wed May 06 22:24:14 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/8210/2026 ORDER DATED: 05/05/2026 undefined District Mahesana for the offence punishable under Sections 2(16), 2(35), 2(36), 9, 39, 50, 51(1), 52, 55 and 59 of the Wild Life Protection Act, 1972.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that, considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed, further incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the Investigation Officer in any manner. It is further contended that, the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

Page 2 of 6 Uploaded by MS.KAJAL KISHORBHAI NAVLAKHA (HCD0076) on Wed May 06 2026 Downloaded on : Wed May 06 22:24:14 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/8210/2026 ORDER DATED: 05/05/2026 undefined

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Mahesana district, hence would be available at the time of trial; ii. The investigation being over and chargesheet has been filed; iii. There is one antecedent against the applicant under the Prohibition Act;
iv. As per the prosecution case, the applicant and co-accused Thakor Pratapji Bhikhaji were caught red handed with the contraband porcupine meat pieces, weighing scales, axe, knife and a piece of wood;
v. As mentioned in the FIR, it was the co-accused Thakor Pratapji Bhikhaji, who had hunted the porcupine and, the applicant was having electric weighing scales, hence, the said co- accused Pratapji had gone to the applicant's house;

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by Page 3 of 6 Uploaded by MS.KAJAL KISHORBHAI NAVLAKHA (HCD0076) on Wed May 06 2026 Downloaded on : Wed May 06 22:24:14 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/8210/2026 ORDER DATED: 05/05/2026 undefined the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No.08/2025-2026 registered with Dharoi Range Police Station, District Mahesana, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; [b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

Page 4 of 6 Uploaded by MS.KAJAL KISHORBHAI NAVLAKHA (HCD0076) on Wed May 06 2026 Downloaded on : Wed May 06 22:24:14 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/8210/2026 ORDER DATED: 05/05/2026 undefined [c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court within a week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Competent Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O. and to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change his residence without prior intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark his presence on every alternate days for one month and thereafter, on every Sunday before the concerned police station till the trial is over;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for which, he shall file affidavits before the concerned court and the police station;

[h] not to enter within the local limits of Mahesana district, except for the purpose of marking his presence and attending the trial before the Competent Court, till the trial is over; Page 5 of 6 Uploaded by MS.KAJAL KISHORBHAI NAVLAKHA (HCD0076) on Wed May 06 2026 Downloaded on : Wed May 06 22:24:14 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/8210/2026 ORDER DATED: 05/05/2026 undefined

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be influenced by any observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) KAJAL Page 6 of 6 Uploaded by MS.KAJAL KISHORBHAI NAVLAKHA (HCD0076) on Wed May 06 2026 Downloaded on : Wed May 06 22:24:14 IST 2026