Gujarat High Court
Juvenile Kishanbhai Bhikhabhai Dabhi ... vs State Of Gujarat on 21 April, 2026
Author: Gita Gopi
Bench: Gita Gopi
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.RA/73/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO. 73 of
2026
================================================================
JUVENILE KISHANBHAI BHIKHABHAI DABHI (THAKOR) THRO
MADHUBEN DARSHILBHAI THAKOR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
================================================================
Appearance:
MR PIYUSH TRIVEDI with MR NAYANKUMAR V SHUKLA(10184) for the
Applicant(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR ROHAN H RAVAL, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 21/04/2026
ORDER
1) RULE. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent- State.
2) The applicant herein the child in conflict with law (CCL) aged about 17 years and 30 days, through his grandmother, under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to in short as the 'JJ Act') has made a prayer to Page 1 of 10 Uploaded by CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212) on Wed Apr 22 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 23 03:42:13 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/73/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026 undefined quash and set aside the judgment and order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Surendranagar, in Criminal Appeal No.234 of 2025 in connection with the First Information Report (FIR) being C.R. No.11211035240330 of 2024 registered with Muli Police Station, Surendranagar for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(J)(K)(N) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and under Sections 3(A), 4, 5(l), 5(j)(2), 6, 9 (L) and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short 'POCSO Act'), and to release CCL on regular bail.
3) The allegations are to the effect that the victim girl, the daughter of the complainant and is aged 14 years 5 months and 9 days was kidnapped by the CCL from the legal guardianship of her parents under the pretext of marrying her, who had taken her to various places, stayed together with the victim girl, established physical relations with her; the girl had become pregnant carrying pregnancy for a period of 5 months.
4) This Court had called for the DNA Report since the victim Page 2 of 10 Uploaded by CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212) on Wed Apr 22 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 23 03:42:13 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/73/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026 undefined had undergone medical termination of pregnancy. The DNA Report matches and declares the CCL to be the biological father.
5) Learned advocate for the CCL Mr. Piyush Trivedi submitted that the Report of the Probation Officer would require a special consideration since the CCL had reported to the Probation Officer that an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- was given in the presence of the members of the community for the engagement and thereafter, they both were visiting each other's houses and were on talking terms. It is further submitted that one day the victim girl had informed the CCL that her parents were harassing her thus, she had threatened that if the CCL would not come and take her away, she would commit suicide. It is also submitted that thereafter, the CCL and the victim both ran away from the house. It is submitted that the CCL had also expressed his opinion before the Probation Officer that in view of his engagement with the victim girl, the parents of the victim girl ought not to have filed a case against him. Further, placing reliance on the Report of the Probation Officer, it is submitted Page 3 of 10 Uploaded by CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212) on Wed Apr 22 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 23 03:42:13 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/73/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026 undefined that it was only on the insistence of the victim girl, the CCL had to elope with her. Considering all the above aspects, it is submitted that this Court may exercise discretion in favour of the CCL.
6) The Report of the Probation Officer suggests that from the tone of speaking, the CCL was found to be normal, self-oriented about the place, time, date and other things. His social understanding was also sharp and was also having an understanding of the entire situation.
7) Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State Mr. Rohan H. Raval submitted that the CCL had a very clear understanding about the social repercussions and he also knew about the consequences of his own act, that itself would prove his mental and physical capacity of understanding the situation. The involvement of the present CCL is clearly reflected on record and therefore, submitted that the order passed by the Appellate Court is proper and urged that the present application be rejected and no discretion be exercised in favour of the CCL.
Page 4 of 10 Uploaded by CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212) on Wed Apr 22 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 23 03:42:13 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/73/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026 undefined
8) The statement relied on by learned advocate for the CCL Mr. Piyush Trivedi suggests that the victim girl had travelled with the CCL, had stayed with him at several places for about 7-8 months. The statement under Section 164 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.P.C.') would reveal that the victim girl makes some reference about Rs.2,00,000/- being paid to her parents for the engagement. There is no further investigation from the side of the police to this contention which has been raised under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. about the statement of the victim girl.
9) Having considered the Report of the Probation Officer as well as the fact that the victim girl stayed with the CCL for about 7-8 months, the application deserves to be allowed.
10) At this stage, it would be appropriate to refer to the case of Child in Conflict with Law Through Savitaben Vitthalbhai Vasava Vs. State of Gujarat, 2022 (0) AIJEL-HC 244005 (passed in CRRA No.901 of 2021 on Page 5 of 10 Uploaded by CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212) on Wed Apr 22 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 23 03:42:13 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/73/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026 undefined 28.04.2022), it has been observed as under:
"17. Section 12 of the JJ Act, 2015 which deals with the grant of bail to a child expressly contains the nonobstante phrase to be as ".... notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or in any other law for the time being in force, be released on bail ...". This very provision in Section 12 clarifies that provisions of Cr.PC is excluded in the case of bail plea of the child. Further, it requires to be noted that Section 12 is a specific provision under the special statute that deals with the matter of bail and accordingly, the application of Section 439 of the Cr.PC is also necessarily excluded. Cr.PC contains a corresponding clause which is for application on special lines. Considering this aspect in case of a bail application on behalf a child, it would be required to be concluded that such bail plea would not be maintable under Section 439 of Cr.PC.
19. Non-applicability of Section 439 of Cr.PC in case of child in conflict with law has been appreciated by various High Courts. This Court would like to refer to the decision of the High Court of Delhi in the case of CCL 'A' v. State (NCT of Delhi) in Bail Application No.2510/2020 (dated 19.10.2020), where the Court had observed as under :-
"44. In formulating the above position, this court finds support in the view taken by the Division Bench of the Chhattisgarh High Court in Tejram Nagrachi Juvenile vs. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Station House Officer4, where the Division Bench has opined that an application for grant of bail under section 437 Cr.P.C. or 439 Cr.P.C. would not be maintainable in the case of a juvenile. The relevant paras of the judgment are as under:
"7. A conjoint analysis of the provisions contained in Sections 437 and 439 of the Code viz a viz Sections 8, 10 and 12 of the Act, 2015 would discern that while there are certain general guidelines under Sections 437 & 439 of the Code, power in respect of grant of bail to a juvenile is more liberal in the nature of command under Section 12(1) that whenever an apparent juvenile alleged to have committed a bailable or nonbailable offence is detained by the police or appears or brought before a Board, such person Page 6 of 10 Uploaded by CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212) on Wed Apr 22 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 23 03:42:13 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/73/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026 undefined shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code or in any other law for the time being in force, be released on bail with or without surety or placed under the supervision of a probation officer or under the care of any fit person. The only rider for not releasing the apparent juvenile is that whenever there appears reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring that person (Juvenile) into association with any known criminal or expose the said person to moral, physical or psychological danger or his release would defeat the ends of justice, the Board shall record the reasons for denying the bail and circumstances that led to such a decision. This rider as contained in proviso to Section 12(1) requires the Board to record reasons for denying the bail. It would mean that ordinarily the bail is to be allowed to a juvenile. The denial being exceptional on certain reasons to be recorded by the Board as provided in the proviso. This special provision is not contained under Section 439 of the Code.
"8. .......... While there is no denial of the fact that when the Court of Sessions exercises appellate power under Section 101(2) and the High Court exercises revisional power under Section 102 of the Act of 2015, it shall exercise power of the Board provided under Section 8(2), but this power of the Board would also be available to the Court of Sessions or to the High Court when it proceeds to examine the plea of juvenile for grant of bail whenever such occasion arises on account of bail application of juvenile being rejected under Section 12 of the Act of 2015. Therefore, by use of the term "otherwise" in Section 8(2), jurisdiction under Section 439 of the Code would not be attracted which is otherwise excluded by use of the term "notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or in any other law for the time being in force", as occurring in Section 12 (1)."
(emphasis supplied)
20. The law therefore, is clear on the aspect that since Section 12 of the JJ Act bears a non- obstante clause which indicates legislative intent that the source of power to grant bail under the JJ Act, 2015 is independent from that of the Cr.PC. Thus, it can be said to be concluded that Section 439 of the Cr.PC is not applicable on the issue of grant or denial of bail to a child alleged to have Page 7 of 10 Uploaded by CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212) on Wed Apr 22 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 23 03:42:13 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/73/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026 undefined committed bailable or non-bailable offence who is to be dealt with by the Special Statute, i.e. JJ Act, 2015 which contains the specific provision for bail under Section 12 of JJ Act, 2015."
11) The case of Barun Chandra Thakur Vs. Master Bholu & Anr., in Criminal Appeal No.950 of 2022, was declared on 13.07.2022 [(2023) 12 SCC 401]. The Hon'ble Supreme Court while dealing with section 15 of the J.J. Act for preliminary assessment of child in conflict with law, observed as under :-
"65. While considering a child as an adult one needs to look at his/her physical maturity, cognitive abilities, social and emotional competencies. It must be mentioned here that from a neurobiological perspective, the development of cognitive, behavioural attributes like the ability to delay gratification, decision making, risk taking, impulsivity, judgement, etc. continues until the early 20s. It is, therefore, all the more important that such assessment is made to distinguish such attributes between a child and an adult.
66. Cognitive maturation is highly dependent on hereditary factors. Emotional development is less likely to affect cognitive maturation. However, if emotions are too intense and the child is unable to regulate emotions effectively, then intellectual insight/knowledge may take a back seat.
70. A child with average intelligence/IQ will have the intellectual knowledge of the consequences of his actions. But whether or not he is able to control himself or his actions will depend on his level of emotional competence. For example, risky driving may result in an accident. But if emotional competence is not high, the urge for Page 8 of 10 Uploaded by CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212) on Wed Apr 22 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 23 03:42:13 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/73/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026 undefined thrill seeking may get the better of his intellectual understanding.
71. Children may be geared towards more instant gratification and may not be able to deeply understand the long-term consequences of their actions. They are also more likely to be influenced by emotion rather than reason. Research shows that young people do know risks to themselves. Despite this knowledge, adolescents engage in riskier behaviour than adults (such as drug and alcohol use, unsafe sexual activity, dangerous driving and/or delinquent behaviour). While they do consider risks cognitively (by weighing up the potential risks and rewards of a particular act), their decisions / actions may be more heavily influenced by social (e.g. peer influences) and/or emotional (e.g. impulsive) tendencies. In addition, the lack of experience coupled with the child's limited ability to deeply understand the long-term consequences of their actions can lead to impulsive / reckless decision making."
12) The judgment and order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Surendranagar, in Criminal Appeal No.234 of 2025 and the order of JJB rejecting bail is set aside.
13) In the result, the present CCL is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR, upon his grandmother executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with a surety of the like amount before the JJB.
Page 9 of 10 Uploaded by CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212) on Wed Apr 22 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 23 03:42:13 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/73/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026 undefined
14) It is directed that the Probation Officer shall monitor the conduct of the CCL and shall quarterly submit the report before the JJB till completion of the trial. Moreover, if the Probation Officer considers any necessity of sending the child for any behavior modification then necessary therapy and psychiatric support be provided to the CCL . 14.1. The grandmother of the juvenile to ensure that the juvenile will not fall into bad company.
15) Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Court/authority by Fax or Email forthwith.
Sd/-
(GITA GOPI, J) CAROLINE / SB-II # 1 Page 10 of 10 Uploaded by CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212) on Wed Apr 22 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 23 03:42:13 IST 2026