United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Haklabhai Harjibhai Sarei

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2435 Guj
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Haklabhai Harjibhai Sarei on 17 April, 2026

                                                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




                                 C/FA/1200/2015                                   ORDER DATED: 17/04/2026

                                                                                                                   undefined




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                     R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1200 of 2015
                                                    With
                                      R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1199 of 2015
                         =====================================================
                                  UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
                                                    Versus
                                     HAKLABHAI HARJIBHAI SAREI & ORS.
                         =====================================================
                         Appearance:
                         MASUMI V NANAVATY(9321) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
                         MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
                         MR ADIL R MIRZA(2488) for the Defendant(s) No. 3
                         MR VILAV K BHATIA(5338) for the Defendant(s) No. 2
                         RULE UNSERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1
                         =====================================================
                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI

                                                            Date : 17/04/2026
                                                                  ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Ms. Masumi V. Nanavaty appearing for the appellant in both the matters, learned advocate Mr. Adil R. Mirza and learned advocate Mr. Vilav K. Bhatia appearing for the respective respondents in both the matters.

2. The appeals arise from the Judgment and award passed in Workmen Compensation (Fatal) Case Nos.4 of 2007 & 3 of 2007 by Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Labour Court, Valsad is challenged under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 by the Insurance Company. Learned Commissioner for Workman Compensation proceeded to grant compensation of Rs.3,36,000/- & Rs.3,05,775/- respectively, and with Rs.2,500/- as funeral expenses and Rs.5,000/- as cost in both the matters.


                                                                 Page 1 of 3

Uploaded by Raj Subhash Dhobi(HC01779) on Fri Apr 17 2026                             Downloaded on : Sat Apr 18 02:24:20 IST 2026
                                                                                                                         NEUTRAL CITATION




                                 C/FA/1200/2015                                         ORDER DATED: 17/04/2026

                                                                                                                         undefined




3. Factual aspect is that deceased Mukesh & Sarjulal were serving as Laborer with Shri Sushant Steel and on 17.04.2006, they had gone for labour work for removing debris at Kharvel, whereby a gas pipeline explosion took place and they suffered burns and during treatment lost their life at the age of 20 & 32 years.

4. Learned advocate Ms. Masumi V. Nanavaty raised contention that accident took place outside the insured premises, and therefore, Commissioner of Workman Compensation cannot grant compensation under Employees Compensation Act, 1923. However, the said issue has been discussed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Daivshala v/s. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. [AIR 2025 SC 3532], whereby, it is held that if person dies in accident during the course of reaching to employment or reaching home after completing his service, it would fall within principle of notional extension of employment and therefore, compensation is liable to be assessed under Employees Compensation Act, 1923.

5. Having heard the submissions made at bar by learned advocates, in opinion of this Court, no substantial question of law involves in the matters. Even otherwise, the amount involved in the subject matter of present First Appeals is on lower side i.e. less than Rs.5,00,000/- and therefore, considering the smallness of the awarded amount involved in the present appeals, the Court is not inclined to entertain the present appeals and therefore, present appeals stand dismissed on account of smallness of amount. However, it is clarified that dismissal of Page 2 of 3 Uploaded by Raj Subhash Dhobi(HC01779) on Fri Apr 17 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Apr 18 02:24:20 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/1200/2015 ORDER DATED: 17/04/2026 undefined present appeals shall not be construed that the Court has decided any legal issue involved in the subject matter of present appeals, and therefore, the decision of present appeals shall not be treated as precedent for deciding any legal issue. Interim relief granted earlier, if any, stands vacated. Record and proceedings, if any, be sent back to learned Trial Court concerned.

6. Learned Commissioner concerned for Workman Compensation is directed to disburse amount of the compensation awarded to original claimants in both the matters.

(J.C. DOSHI, J.) Raj Page 3 of 3 Uploaded by Raj Subhash Dhobi(HC01779) on Fri Apr 17 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Apr 18 02:24:20 IST 2026