Hemlataben Sanjaybhai Rana (Deleted) vs Chhotu Shriram Ratan Mukhiya (Deleted)

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6952 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Hemlataben Sanjaybhai Rana (Deleted) vs Chhotu Shriram Ratan Mukhiya (Deleted) on 25 September, 2025

                                                                                                                NEUTRAL CITATION




                              C/CA/4931/2025                                    ORDER DATED: 25/09/2025

                                                                                                                undefined




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 4931
                                               of 2025

                                          In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 28582 of 2025

                      ==========================================================
                                HEMLATABEN SANJAYBHAI RANA (DELETED) & ORS.
                                                  Versus
                               CHHOTU SHRIRAM RATAN MUKHIYA (DELETED) & ORS.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      NISHIT A BHALODI(9597) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3
                      ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

                                                         Date : 25/09/2025

                                                                ORAL ORDER

1. The present application has been preferred for seeking condonation of delay of 38 days caused in preferring the appeal against the impugned judgment and award.

2. Heard learned advocate for the applicant.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the delay of 38 days has occasioned owing to the poverty of the applicant and as he could not arrange the finance for preferring the appeal. He further submitted that the delay is neither intentional nor malafide but has occasioned owing to the reasons as stated in paragraph 3 of the application.

4. Having considered the submissions of the learned advocate Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by MR.CHIRAG DESHRAJ PAL(HCD0072) on Fri Sep 26 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 27 02:12:50 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/CA/4931/2025 ORDER DATED: 25/09/2025 undefined for the applicant and having regard to the ground for delay pressed into service, I am of the considered view that the delay has been sufficiently explained and the same deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. No order as to costs.

(MOOL CHAND TYAGI, J) CDP Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by MR.CHIRAG DESHRAJ PAL(HCD0072) on Fri Sep 26 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 27 02:12:50 IST 2025