Ratilal Veljibhai Kasundra vs Hareshbhai Dayabhai Bhimani

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6881 Guj
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Ratilal Veljibhai Kasundra vs Hareshbhai Dayabhai Bhimani on 23 September, 2025

                                                                                                             NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/CA/4341/2025                                   ORDER DATED: 23/09/2025

                                                                                                              undefined




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 4341
                                               of 2025

                                         In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 25476 of 2025

                      ==========================================================
                                            RATILAL VELJIBHAI KASUNDRA
                                                       Versus
                                        HARESHBHAI DAYABHAI BHIMANI & ORS.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR AR PATEL(5838) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

                                                        Date : 23/09/2025

                                                           ORAL ORDER

1. The present application has been preferred for seeking condonation of delay of 161 days caused in preferring the appeal against the impugned judgment and award.

2. Heard learned advocate for the applicant.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the delay of 161 days occasioned in preferring the appeal owing to the reasons that the applicant could not obtain the certified copy of the impugned judgment and award within a time and further he could not find the advocate to prefer the appeal. Therefore, the sufficient time has been wasted in obtaining the certified copy. He further submitted that the delay is neither intentional Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by MR.CHIRAG DESHRAJ PAL(HCD0072) on Wed Sep 24 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 24 22:56:34 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/CA/4341/2025 ORDER DATED: 23/09/2025 undefined nor malafide but has occasioned owing to the reasons stated in para-5 of the application.

4. Having considered the submissions of the learned advocate for the applicant and having regard to the ground for delay pressed into service for condoning the delay, I am of the considered view that the delay has been sufficiently explained and the same deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. No order as to costs.

(MOOL CHAND TYAGI, J) CDP Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by MR.CHIRAG DESHRAJ PAL(HCD0072) on Wed Sep 24 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 24 22:56:34 IST 2025